Lockerbie Evidence Was Planted By The CIA

reply to post by Rasputin13
It was structural failure or fuel tank explosion, whatever! The tragedy was then used for subversive international strategic purposes.These problems with the aircraft had caused plenty of previous catastrophes .
I will now give the real motive behind the simplistic ameteurish accusers of Liberia.( a Libyan conspiracy, how ironic this,coming from the arch conspirators) The implications of admitting another failure with the particular aircraft would mean the grounding of the world transport system, It just could not be allowed.

reply to post by Anonymous ATS

---

A center fuel tank explosion? Whatever. The 747 did NOT have a major problem with this. If you're going to make a claim like that, provide proof of it. The only time planes had a major problem with center wing fuel tanks was when the KC-135 switched to a new fuel pump, and it was a faulty design.

reply to post by Zaphod58

---

Sir, what an obvious defence of the criminal plotters IE,big money,big industry,big nationalistic concerns,big PROVEN conspirators. Every Big Time Crook shouts this defence= Prove it! uh!
You suggest i prove it.Well even with all the power of the Nations involved in the virilent cover up by their authorities, the trumped up heap of evidence was so amateurish,it failed to convince a jury who acquitted one of the two sacrificial accused. Which PROVES it must
have been a very weak case.
All evidence can be fabricated/planted by bent authorities, yes lifted fingerprints and DNA included.
So we must look at the big picture and not be bogged down with supposed cast iron Alice in wonderland, PLANTED PROOF.

And you have yet to show ANYTHING that shows the 747 had fuel pump problems. Just because a jury disagreed with evidence doesn't mean anything. I've seen people get off after a jury acquited them with a video tape of them comitting the crime. Where's the proof that the 747 is a horrible design that fell out of the skies because of a design flaw?

I just love how people creep out from the bushes with lame excuses like "We maybe planted the circuit board but we did not bomb it" and lines like that.

First off do not ever associate yourself with higher beings as CIA is, because you are not. You are not even worthy the air you breed, in CIA eyes.

Second, if it turns out that CIA did plant that evidence, who is to tell what evidence CIA has planted before and after?

Best regards.

Loke

reply to post by Rasputin13

---

Educated assumptions based upon previous actions can lead one to an early conclusion.

We have enough evidence showing the corruption by our governments, which allows us to jump to conclusions, based upon said previous corruption, plausability and what could and/or was gained through said actions.

This doesnt mean we disregard evidence, it just allows us to focus more attention on the likely perp, just like "detectives" will eliminate the unlikely candidates.

Is the true identity of "the Lockerbie bomber" an American citizen with connections to the CIA?


‘I’LL REVEAL TRUE IDENTITY OF BOMBER’

So if the CIA planted the evidence, does that mean they did it???

Quite confusing...I also found it hard to believe that one single man would do this...


Anything regarding the CIA is fishy. They really are terrorists with badges.