It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Mass revealing? Must've missed that!

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Sep, 1 2005 @ 03:49 PM

Originally posted by redize
We are their food source. If they announced their presence and we found out that we were their cattle, there could possibly be an uprising or resistance against them. This means they would probably have to put unecessary effort into catching us.

Whereas if they remain secret, they can just pick people out and munch them in secret without causing global panic and making it harder for themselves.

I don't know, just a thought.

[edit on 1/9/2005 by redize]

She did mention something like that.
She said that if they were to leave, they weren't going to give any effort into going into people's homes and forcing them into their ships.
I'm guessing from what she's said that they really don't have any way to leave the planet yet, so that's why they're going into Isreal to get to the aircraft they supposedly have underground [I think she said there was going to be some fleets coming also], so if they were to enslave us we'd most likely kick the crap out of them since there's so many of us and they're out in hiding with no real way to leave until the time comes.
Makes you think..

[edit on 9/1/2005 by Logical_Psycho]

posted on Sep, 1 2005 @ 04:24 PM
I remember her saying something about a incoming fleet, was she talking about more reptillians or the Plaeidians? I forget.

Why do you think they hid their ship under the desert in the first place? What's so special to them about the middle east?

Also, don't you find it a bit odd that they are using their seismic creator to start making volcanos active to "dirty the sky" thus enabling them to leave in secrecy?
Why do they need to leave earth under the secret cover of volcanic ash if they are first going to reveal themselves in a mass sighting first.

Some things Peggy mentioned were a little contradictive to say the least, but maybe if we were able to hear the proper recordings (not just snippets) we'd be able to better understand the whole situation.

Also, she mentioned in the beginning, that she had recordings of someone very well known and important. She referred to him as the first speaker I think.

A little while later the presenter asked who he was, to which she said she couldn't disclose his identity as the recordings she had of him were very damaging. Later on the presenter then asks if he is part of the government to which Peggy neither aknowledged (?) nor denied.

Anyone got any ideas who this speaker is? I've got a few ideas.

[edit on 1/9/2005 by redize]

[edit on 1/9/2005 by redize]

posted on Sep, 1 2005 @ 09:48 PM
If you say bush I'm gonna do something...

posted on Sep, 1 2005 @ 10:02 PM
link what??

posted on Sep, 1 2005 @ 10:09 PM

Originally posted by redize what??

I don't know. Maybe not vote the republicans a straight ticket.

posted on Sep, 1 2005 @ 10:27 PM

Good one!

I don't think i'd like to say who I think it is. Just in case the government monitor this site somehow.

I wouldn't like to get arrested for slander!!!

When it comes to politics I don't pay attention nor vote for them. They all promise "wonderous" things but never produce the goods.

No way is my vote going for any of those fat-cats!!!

new topics

top topics
<< 1   >>

log in