Currently trying to locate documented instances of actual cures (particularly relating to cancer) due to homeopathy, as well as deaths from
homeopathic treatment. There's no doubt that in some cases it can be very effective in treating conditions associated with cancer, but I'm
yet to see any reliable evidence that it can cure.
As someone who has also worked within the pharmaceutical industry (for far too long - I'm so jaded sometimes), I'm also aware of the physiological
results of ingesting certain substances; to that end, I'm still trying to locate information on the cure rates, and the death rates, associated with
homeopathic treatments.
Once again, the jury does appear to be "still out" - many homeopathic practitioners are indeed nothing more than frauds, but as my own doctor in
England was one too, I have to consider that there's some therapeutic value.
Mind you, it does appear (at this point, anyway), that such value is due to placebo. And that's not really a bad thing, all things considered.
There have been some clinical trials relating to homeopathy treatments, and though the results
still don't indicate a definite answer one way or the other there does appear to be some results suggesting a positive therapeutic value,
though this site suggests little-to-no value at all.


Seriously though, homeopathic companies act differently? It is the same principle - even though
homeopathic approach demands special treatment per each patient i see dozens of mass produced products that contain only solvents/bulk powders and
cost fortune. At least pharma companies add measurable amount of poison that does something,not placebo. 