NEW EVIDENCE DOCUMENTS HOW FAILURES LED TO BIN LADEN'S RISE TO POWER, page
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 31-8-2003 @ 11:49 PM by dragonrider
New book provides evidence of the Klinton complicity in the rise to power of Osama Bin Laden, and 911. This is not a new theory, but the first time documentation has been put together to prove it.






President Bill Clinton had the opportunity to stop, catch, or kill bin Laden more than twelve times during his presidency, a new book set for release this week claims!

And on at least two occasions through Drones and Global Positioning Systems the Clinton Administration knew exactly where bin Laden was -- and refused to take him out well after knowing he was as a national security threat.


LOSING alleges and details:

* Osama bin Laden’s rise to power and the September 11 attacks were due to the inactions and failures of former President Bill Clinton and key members of his administration who followed a law enforcement approach to fighting global terrorism as opposed to engaging a war on terrorism on national security grounds.

* How each failure by Clinton to retaliate made bin Laden look invincible in the Arab world, allowing bin Laden to attract new recruits and money.

* The 1993 World Trade Center attack --- documents how Clinton refused to believe it was a terrorist attack and viewed the bombing as an FBI investigation therefore blocking the CIA from entering the investigation on matters of national security.

* Drawn from secret Sudanese intelligence files, the full story of bin Laden's role in shooting down America's Black Hawk helicopters in Mogadishu, Somalia. This is the story that "Black Hawk Down" missed.

* President Clinton and a Democratic Senator Dennis DeConcini prevented the CIA from hiring Arabic translators-while bin Laden and Arabic-speaking terrorists killed Americans across the Near East.

* The story of Saudi Arabia's attempt to assassinate bin Laden in 1994.

* One of the FBI's most-trusted informants, Ali Mohammed, an Egyptian soldier, was given a military security clearance but was actually a double agent working for bin Laden.

* How the Administration engaged a policy to get Bin Laden removed from the Sudan back to Pakistan and Afghanistan only to get him closer to training camps and his recruits making him even more dangerous and embolden future terrorist acts.

* How Assistant Secretary of State for East Africa Affairs Susan Rice blocked opportunities to work with the Sudanese government looking to turn over bin Laden to the United States.

* Documents numerous Sudanese attempts to work with the United States to capture bin Laden only to be rejected by the US State Department.

* How the Monica Lewinsky and fundraising scandals, as well as a consuming desire to be re-elected, prevented Clinton from waging a war on terror and bin Laden and prevent 9/11.

* For more than two years Miniter interviewed soldiers, diplomats and intelligence operatives in Middle East, Africa, and Europe but found his best sources were, to his surprise, top level Clinton administration officials including former National Security Advisor Tony Lake, former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger, former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, Clinton’s counterterrorism coordinator Richard Clarke, and former Director of Central Intelligence James Woolsey.


www.drudgereport.com...


reply posted on 1-9-2003 @ 02:27 AM by falcon
These nuts have ZERO credibilty & wouldn't know a real honest fact if it bit them on their corporate A$$!

I haven't posted because I've been on vacation for 3 weeks. Now that this place is minus one NUT (thank God for that!)I'll be sure to post more often! Thanks!

[Edited on 1-9-2003 by romantico]


Oh really lol
who as far as the nut is concirned is missing or is no longer going to be here making comments on this subject. As well as


These nuts have ZERO credibilty & wouldn't know a real honest fact if it bit them on their corporate A$$!
[Edited on 1-9-2003 by romantico]


Just who exactly is this directed at if it is directed at me I would point out that I have been here for some time I dont post as often as I used to because I have seen alot of people wake up to the reality of the everyday situations that we are facing. Past Examples= Micoplasma issue, Bohemian Grove, 2025 Airforce White Papers so on so forth. Wouldnt know a honest fact if it bit me in the butt yea ok.

I really love the part on the zero creditabilty thats classic.

"The same people accusing Clinton of this BS are the same ones who are spewing all the other lies they can't prove!"

Is this to suggest that bill could not or rather did not do anything wrong at all? And please lets stick to somthing other than the main stream media ideas of the Blo_ Job Incident as well as all the other relationship scandels that came out are you telling me that there is not one case of wrong doing on the part of bill clinton? How about iran contra that he was partners with bush before he took office? This did not take place or it just never existed? How about presidental excutive order PDD-NSC60. Clairify these points please.

Falcon

No creditablity ... .. ..... ..



reply posted on 1-9-2003 @ 07:33 AM by romantico
RELAX!I was referring to Freemason.The man is just a coulter-esque nut bag!He was blinded by rage & rage only! Yeah, I say ZERO credibilty! Are you goona tell me the Clinton haters DIDN'T claim Bill was gonna host a tv show? Or the Clinton's WERE getting a divorce?Or that they STILL insist Hilary is running & so on?Your living in la-la land if you think the right wing has been honest in their Clinton claims!Laugh all you will,God knows I'm laughing at such a foolish claim! Bush dropped his dog today according to Drudgereport.Why not blame that on Clinton as well.While your at it,lets blame him for the heat & deaths in France this summer!

Jawapunk,your right.There would be no Bin Laden had it not been for Reagan or Bush sr.(after all Bush & Reagan both supplied Iranweapons to fight Iraq.Do the words "iran Contra"ring a bell?)Things are not as they appear & I realize Bush takes alot of sh*t that he doesn't deserve & the same goes for Clinton.I love Bill Clinton,but he was far from perfect(who is?)but this is just one fairy tale thats BS.There is NO credibilty to it once so ever.Its an ex Wallstreet journal editorial writer making a quick buck!He has nothing.No facts,just heresay & gossip.I could go out tomorrow & write a book on Bush & claim he raped me.I don't need proof.All I need to say is things like,"an un-named source confirmed this story" or an "close associate who wishes to not be named agess with this story".How come this isn't headline news?How come an investigation hasn't taken place?(when it comes to Clinton,the right wing love their investigations)Theres no truth in this story.

Desperate Clinton haters will believe anything negative written about the Clinton's.They don't need proof or evidence,just a claim is good enough for them.I say these people really need to get a life!
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Now a witness to Breitbart\'s death vanishes
  Posted 17 days ago with 6 member flags
Cuba: Judge Rejects Efforts to Open CIA Volume on Bay of Pigs
  Posted 13 days ago with 4 member flags
US Official Detained for Donation to Al Qaeda - Anonymous Involved
  Posted 12 days ago with 2 member flags