Originally posted by TheManWithThePlan
Thanks for the link. I will read into this a lot more. OnlyInMyDreams, this is a perfect report, from what I read so far, and is going to be very
useful to my personal UFO investigation. It could is biased, but, from what I read, it is also very intriguing and logically based. Very extensive.
It's very well written, but it also, arbitrarily, tossed-out many important UFO sightings. That is, its critical flaw was that it ignored data...
And with 'selective' data, even the best analysis can be wrong. It was also, and this should be stated again, convened NOT to see if UFOs were
real, but to permanently show why the USAF shouldn't spend time researching them with Blue Book. J Allen Hynek, who worked on Blue Book, at first as
a debunker, then as a 'believer', would later comment at length as to how Condon was 'rigged' (I have a tape of a radio interview he did where he
is talking about just that... wher did I put it?).
I believe everyone should read the report -- don't get me wrong -- but it should be noted that the data set they are working from is not complete.
When I have more time, I'll post links up here (I can't figure out how some of you guys can be on ATS 20 hours a day... I mean, I post in like 10
minute windows while on break at work... Hmm, well, considering taht some of you guys are paid by the gov to read these sites and discredited