Why Iapetus Is Not Artificial
August 18 2005
It’s been a few months since those Cassini pictures of Saturn’s moon Iapetus came in. It revealed some striking surface features. Then, there are
rumors all over the Internet about how this moon may have been made by a superior extra-terrestrial race. Richard C. Hoagland seems to be once again
behind this lunacy. He hasn’t gotten much attention ever since scientists, mathematicians, engineers, and astronomers alike debunked his precious
Cydonia into the stratosphere. Hoagland even appeared on Coast-to-Coast AM a few times to further post his “evidence” and other rubbish that
aliens built the moon. To him [Hoagland] Iapetus is as natural as Michael Jackson’s nose.
New close up pictures of the surface of a moon of Saturn named Iapetus came in. Reveals some very extraordinary surface features.
Psudoscience is the main problem here. We have a moon of a distant planet [Saturn] that NASA doesn’t know much about. Richard C. Hoagland is losing
“followers” and needs some fresh material ever since his Cydonia ideas have been debunked to a paste.
The Very Short Bio of Hoagland:
Richard C. Hoagland is not a scientist. He never worked for NASA as he claimed. He has no degree in physics, math, or any science. He never graduated
from collage and he became a museum curator. He did win an award but “under conditions”. No scientists were present at the judging for the award.
He claimed to be the first to suggest that Europa has liquid water under it’s icy crust, this was a lie. He began to claim that artificial
structures existed on Mars. This was debunked, hard. Now he claims Iapetus is artificial to freshen up his appearance.
Strange formations are visible on the surface of Iapetus. Craters seem to have a hexagonal appearance. Strange wall surrounds the equator. Impact
craters on the same latitude lines. Weird orbital inclination and distance from Saturn shows uncanny artificial properties that must mean aliens.
Strange shape of the moon, shaped like a C60 molecule. Light weight of the moon itself. All of his evidence he provided will be debunked in this
thread because I had enough of this rubbish.
I strongly disagree with everything Hoagland says. He is a liar and a deceiver that creates his own twisted reality for profit. He bases all his
knowledge on sci-fi, especially Star Trek. He doesn’t seem to understand that the term Science FICTION. He comes to conclusions without substantial
evidence, which is not good science. He exploits the intelligence of some simple-minded people by creating enormous articles on his site about a topic
that go absolutely nowhere and then comes to a conclusion giving the appearance that he looks like he knows what he’s doing. The reality is he
doesn’t know what he is doing! Doing this to people for profit makes me sick. I’ll be against all of his evidence in this thread.
This is a good one get ready…
That Iapetus was, indeed— an ancient “seedship” … from the Stars. – Hoagland
Wow, there you have it, the most uneducated conclusion of all time. If you didn’t pass out laughing then let the debunking begin.
Links you better check out:
[edit on 8/18/2005 by GoldEagle]