Top Ten Scientific Facts : Evolution is False and Impossible., page 12


Pages: <<  9    10    11    12    13    14    15  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 86 times


reply posted on 27-3-2006 @ 03:56 AM by Zaphod58
Just because a bone can withstand wind resistance makes it really strong? You're confusing density with strength though. For their size bones in birds are quite strong. But their density is low, to make them light enough for a bird to fly. A human with the same density wouldn't be able to move, because everytime they stepped their legs would probably break, or everytime they hit their arm against something it would break. But because you're talking a small light bird, they're quite strong FOR THE SIZE.

Oh, and falcons don't "bash their prey with their breastbones", they hit them with their talons when they stoop.

Pursuit (Attack). Several modes recognizable: stoop, ringing up, direct pursuit, contour-hugging, shepherding, running or hopping, and flapping on ground (see also Behavior: locomotion, below). Stoop is well-known mode: dive from above quarry, varying from <100 to >1,000 m long and from 90° angle to horizontal to <20°, in which gravity and body mass produce velocities in range of 25 to 100 m s-1; used to overtake and catch fleeing prey usually flying but sometimes running on ground or swimming in water. In shallow stoop or initial stage of steep one, falcon sometimes flaps wings, but in long, steep dives, wings are folded against body (Franklin 1999); rate of fall can be slowed by slight adjustments of wings, legs, and head (Tucker et al. 1998). Occurs over land and water. Most often stooping falcon pulls out of dive some meters behind escaping prey and shoots forward at great speed to grab or strike prey, or repeatedly stoops to force it down into water or onto open ground where it can be grabbed. Sometimes stoops directly down on prey, striking it in head, wing, or back, killing it or breaking wing (Cade 1982, TJC, CMW, WGH).

bna.birds.cornell.edu...

[edit on 3/27/2006 by Zaphod58]


reply posted on 27-3-2006 @ 04:23 AM by undo
Scroll down to the info on peregrine falcons:



THINGS WITH WINGS PEREGRINE FALCON

How is this falcon like a football player?
The peregrine falcon has black markings
under its eyes, like many football players put on. This helps absorb sunlight below the
eyes to cut down on the glare. It helps them see to assist with their hunting.
Like all living things, the peregrine falcon needs to get energy to survive. Put these actions in the
order that they occur so a peregrine can survive. Put a 1 to show the first thing.
peregrine pulls the prey apart
prey drops toward the ground
special “tooth” or notch in peregrine’s beak is used to bite and sever spinal cord at the
neck (prey is killed quickly)
hits prey with its breastbone
peregrine swallows its prey
peregrine grabs prey with its talons (curved claws) powered by strong feet
About how fast can the peregrine fly in a dive?
200 miles an hour!!


So essentially the peregrine falcon hits its prey with its breastbone, while travelling at 200 mph. So bones don't have to be dense to take impact. Secondly, if the wing bones are strong and dense enough, they could withstand the weight of a human body, doncha think?

(mod edit: broken link fix)


[edit on 27-3-2006 by Riwka]


reply posted on 27-3-2006 @ 04:36 AM by Zaphod58
If bones aren't light, birds don't fly. it's that simple. Some bones are heavier and stronger than others, but ALL their bones are designed to be as light as possible.

There is a weight limit for a flapping bird. The heavier the animal, the bigger its wings need to be. The bigger the wings, the more muscle is needed to move them. The biggest flying bird today is called the Great Bustard. They weigh as much as 32 pounds and are 4 feet long.

The best way to fly is to be light. So most birds are small. Birds have feathers that are very light weight. The bones that birds have are also made for lightness. Birds have less bones than most animals. The bones they have are hard but thin. The biggest bones in flying birds are the breast bone and the shoulder bones.

Some birds have bones weighing less than their feathers. The powerful flying birds have medium weight skeletons. Birds that don't fly have the heaviest skeleton. In birds many bones are fused together. In this way not as many muscles are needed. The biggest muscles a bird has are its flight muscles. These are very strong because they have to raise the entire body into the air.

sln.fi.edu...

Birds have a lot of adaptations for flight. Their bones are hollow and light, but strong, They have light feathers which catch the air. They can fold up their wings when they are not in use. Their lungs are extra efficient at extracting oxygen from the air (we huff and puff when running, and flying is much harder!). They eat huge amounts of high-energy food, relative to their body weight.

van.hep.uiuc.edu...

Many birds have hollow bones to reduce their weight. (Check this site for more information on the adaptations of the skeletons of birds.) These special bones are very strong though, to cope with the forces necessary for flight. (Birds that do not fly but dive need the weight of solid bones. Penguins are in this category.) Instead of relatively heavy teeth, birds have light jaws and beaks. The gizzard, present in many birds and used for digestion, is in the middle of the body, and helps keep the bird steady when flying.

Even the reproductive organs are specialized to reduce size. A female bird has only one ovary which is normally very small. During breeding season, this one ovary will increase up to 1,500 times in size. She will become more reliant on the male to bring her food during this time when her flying is impaired.

An interesting link is from the Cincinnati Zoo where they have an exhibit showing children their shape and weight if they were a bird! To achieve and maintain flight, a bird has to have tremendous muscles. Over 30 percent of a hummingbird's weight is in its flight muscles. In fact, the flapping motion is one of the most strenuous activities in the entire animal kingdom. The heavier the bird, the more difficult is flight. The top weight range of flying birds is about 20 - 30 pounds. Examples that come to mind of this upper limit are mute swans, California condors, and some pelicans.

birding.about.com...

If the wing bones were dense enough they would be useless for a human, because we couldn't even get off the ground with them. So we'd end up losing them.

[edit on 3/27/2006 by Zaphod58]


reply posted on 27-3-2006 @ 01:13 PM by Rren
Originally posted by melatonin
Hi Rren,

Hope your well


Very well thanks, you?


I'd heard of such mutations before. Isn't it more of a case that there are predictable mutations under certain circumstances at certian parts of the genome? So the genome is biased towards certain mutations due to intense selection pressures?


The terms, as I understand them, "directed" and "random" mutations are a bit ambiguous... guess the same can be said for the terms "intelligent" and "design" lol. This often comes up in papers and debates that I've read and wanted to try and understand it better... that page has been helpful but I wouldn't say i completely "get it" yet. Of course, from what I read, evolutionary biologists are still unsure as to what it all means and what implications it may have on Darwinian evolution...

The arguments, again as I understand them, is that NDT wouldn't predict such "directed" mutations where an ID hypothesis would. Not claiming that's true on either point, but it's what I'm getting out of it... just another argument that's mostly over my head... I do know it's a big issue/problem for an NDT evolutionary model (many non-IDers talk about it) but I'm not sure what, if anything, that means for the design paradigm. I guess you could say that it shows evolution is as much a directed mechanism than it is driven by random chance/circumstance... IOW the ability of an organism to adapt/evolve is a built-in ability more so than a product of beneficial mutations of the genome. Of course that's my (mostly) uninformed conclusion and i'm still to 'green' to argue anything to that effect. That's why I just posted the link without comment... still trying to grasp the relevant issues. Thanks for your link BTW, I've got it in my folder and will give it a proper read when I have some more time.

Mattison0922 has discussed this around here before... I'll send him a u2u after i post this and see if he wants to post something here. Your a nueroscientist(PhD) while i'm a contractor(high-school diploma) so I doubt I could debate or discuss this to your, or anyone's, satisfaction.

Think mattison has all but given up on the O&C forum here, but I know he enjoys discussing this with his peers and you certainly qualify as that... only some much "God did it" and "You ignorant religous zealot" type stuff you can hear before you just give up out of frustration. Me i'm just too dumb to know better.

Talk to you soon,
-Rren


reply posted on 28-3-2006 @ 05:49 AM by lunaga50
Sorry if this seems a little out of place but it seems those trying to disprove evolution on animals that there enviroment now no longer suits them, like the Zebra... but you seems to forget that they are a pack oriented highly maturnal creature, and that MOST predatory animals see in black and white for a better view of moving targets... but please also forget that even we with our "superior abilitys" have a problem in the case of them moving in a close net herd telling where one animal ends and another begins, its the excact same as striped fish that swim in schools to confuse their predators... it may no longer suit them now that predators have evolved themselves to better catch their prey, but dont forget even if we cant see it happening, all things living around us, including us are still changing and evolving, along with the fact that in alot of animals, including us, they have evolved to ways of being able to properly migrate, we've found many bacteria that produce the mineral Magnitite, weve also found out that we ourselves do so in a very low amount, then that crows can infact see the ionisation effects of the earths magnetic field, its beyond me with the knowledge of this that there definitaly isnt a group "consioucness" driving torwards packs, flocks, prides, whatever to slowly change torwards a better condition for the whole of the species. I can somewhat agree with the ideas behind Intelligent Design, but Creationism to me is a huge load. as I point back to a past post by me on page 10...


reply posted on 28-3-2006 @ 08:09 AM by SportyMB
Good links posted by Zaphod58
bna.birds.cornell.edu
sln.fi.edu
van.hep.uiuc.edu

birding.about.com
An interesting link is from the Cincinnati Zoo where they have an exhibit showing children their shape and weight if they were a bird! To achieve and maintain flight, a bird has to have tremendous muscles. Over 30 percent of a hummingbird's weight is in its flight muscles. In fact, the flapping motion is one of the most strenuous activities in the entire animal kingdom. The heavier the bird, the more difficult is flight. The top weight range of flying birds is about 20 - 30 pounds. Examples that come to mind of this upper limit are mute swans, California condors, and some pelicans.


Originally posted by chaiyah99
You're convincing me that this is not a friendly place.

(joking)


Wow... well someone better tell the chickens! I had chickens on my farm, they can still fly. (Not long flights, but they can fly none the less.) I have seen them fly 20 to 30 feet across and up into trees as high as 10 to 12 feet.

There's a difference between flying and a few wing assisted leaps into a tree.


www.urbanext.uiuc.edu...
Domestic chickens have essentially lost the ability to fly. Heavy breeds used for meat production cannot do more than flap their wings and jump to a little higher level or move more rapidly along the ground. The lighter-bodied birds can fly short distances, and some can fly over relatively high fences. The feet and shank portions of the legs have scales.

petcaretips.net...



[edit on 28/3/2006 by SportyMB]

[edit on 28/3/2006 by SportyMB]
Pages: <<  9    10    11    12    13    14    15  >>    ^^TOP^^



Bill Nye: Creationism is not appropriate for children.
  Posted 15 days ago with 20 member flags
Satan hid the fossils to trick everyone!
  Posted 18 days ago with 11 member flags
Just ONE question on evolution
  Posted 15 days ago with 5 member flags
M U T A T I O N - Friend or Foe of Evolution?
  Posted 8 days ago with 5 member flags
When a Child is Born...the Evolution begins
  Posted 5 days ago with 5 member flags
Denisovans
  Posted 15 days ago with 3 member flags
Are Humans the result of Hybridization?
  Posted 14 days ago with 3 member flags