The Indian Defence Minister, Paranab Mukherjee, and his American counterpart,
Donald Rumsfeld, have signed a new framework for the US-Indian defence relationship for
the next 10 yrs to reflect common principles and shared national intrests.
(The 2 countries had signed the "Agreed Minutes on Defence Relations"in 95')
They say...The new framework would provide opportunities in areas such as technology
transfer, co-production and reserach and development.
The framework agreement's highlights are :-
1. The agreement could lead to an expansion of defence trade.
2. Conducting joint military exercises and exchanges.
3. Collaborating in multinational operations and when it is in their common intrest.
4. Strenthening the military's capability to defeat terrorism.
5. Enhancing capabilities to combat profileration of weapons of mass destruction.
6. Expanding collaboration in missile defence.
7. The Defence Policy Group will continue to be the primary mechanism to guide bilateral
strategic defence relationship.
8. A defence procurement and production group to be set up which will oversee defence
trade and look at prospects for co-production and technology collaboration.
Following criticism of the framework agreement by the Opposition parties, the Defence
Minister made the following remarks:
- The framework agreement is not a pact or treaty.
- It deals with points of agreement and not disagreement.
- There will be no purchase of complete defence systems from the USA or any other country
- It is a follow up of the minutes of a defence cooperation pact signed in 1995, which
expires this year
- The joint production of equipment and transfer of technology will help India in correcting
critical gaps in missile technology.
- Collaboration in multinational peacekeeping operations will be under the UN umbrella.
- India sticks to its demand that all US restrictions on high-tech transfers to India
should be lifted as the country's track record in safeguards was very high.
- India-U.S cooperation in defence was not at the expense of Russia or any other country.
And finally .. the issue highlighted by the Critics:
- There is no mention of a security or defence partnership with US in the common minimum
programme.
- The Government has taken a major step in tying up with the US to serve its strategic
goals in Asia.
- India will place itself in the category of Japan, Sounth Korea, and the Phillipines
...all traditional military allies of the US government
- India will be drawn into the US-sponsored missile defence shield under the cover of
the US providing the patriot missile system.
- No specific commitment by the US to lift curbs on supply of high technology or dual
use technology to India.
- It is meant to lure India to buy F-16 planes and open the Indian markets for Us weaponary.
- Implicit in the framework is the US interest in getting the Indian Navy to patrol the
Malacca Straits and other international seas as part of its proflieration security
initiative.
- The framework runs counter to India forgoing a "triangle" with Russia & China, and
groupings like BISAC - Brazil, India, and South Africa.
Well there you go.. i have put in all the bits and pieces i gathered and i hope it isnt
too long for you guys..This is my first thread here on ATS..and im excited.
im new here.. i been a guest for a while now
.Apologies..if there are unreadable spelling errors.. i took atmost care
not to make any.. but you never know!!Also i apologise if this matter has been dealt with already!
I want to know your opinion this issue....
Could it work out that easily?
Is this a begining of like we say.. "a beautiful friendship"? "

"
or.. does anybody think so "otherwise"?
or does anybody think its even something more than "otherwise"?
Thank you for reading!
Nabeel
ed all-caps in title
[edit on 17-8-2005 by DontTreadOnMe]