It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by highgroundsys0p
911 + 911 = 311, 311 + 911 = Sept 7th - Will it be live or Memorex? Guess we'll find out in the fullness of time.
Crakeur said:
We nuke Iran and you can be sure there will be some other radioactive exchanges from other countries. I would say a global nightmare will be unleashed. who would want to be the leader of wasted landscape? what does that accomplish?
jungle_jake said:
The CIA, I'm sure, has the resources to mount a denial of service attack against this website 24/7 for as long as they needed. They could also hack into the database and wipe all the information. They could also go kidnap Skeptic Overlord and force him to get rid of all the information, wipe any backups, and none of us would be the wiser. One day, we'd just see that ATS was gone. With the morality you seem to believe drives these people, these options are just one little frosting flower on a massive cake.
Originally posted by NinjaCodeMonkey
Just remember that they also use this website as a tool to spread disinformation and to keep us bogged down while the truth escapes our grasp. There are many members of this forum who are paid to disrupt us and slow us down with useless hate driven threads.
JungleJake said:
As I had said, though, a denial of service attack in conjunction with a kidnapping would bring ATS down in a second.
Originally posted by smallpeepsYou are talking about the NWO in your post. This implies that other gov'ts are possibly part of the equasion. Are you sure that a nuclear exchange would result from an isolated nuke in the USA? I've read the same thing from others on ATS and they are CERTAIN the US would respond with nukes. I'm not so sure myself. I think a lot of this rhetoric is designed to produce a state of mind in the American people. Bush, however, doesn't want the world polarized against him.
Let's say the PNAC says "We'll absorb a nuke but we won't go nuclear with the enemy, we'll just use our carriers and planes and full conventional might in response." ...Wouldn't the US be seen as being almost restrained in that case?
Originally posted by Crakeur
I don't believe we would nuke our own city. I don't believe bush was behind 9/11. I don't believe in the NWO, Illuminati or shadow gov't. I do believe NWA put out one good cd and the rest was fair at best. I do believe our current leader is missing a few nuts and bolts but I don't believe he is crazy enough to nuke his own people. I don't understand the reason for it either. Unless he is doing all of this so that the american people will revolt and bring about Titor's prophecy (don't believe in that either by the way) - that would be more believable to me
In a sea of ever increasingly gullible people on this forum, its nice to see people that are not. It's refreshing.
The concept of our president taking office and in a very short amount of time organizing a crew to commit a large and heinous act against his own people, all the while keeping it completely secret, with not a single whistleblower, just seems hard to pull off.