It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Nova
No questions that they haven't been violent before, I just mean that to my knowledge they've never employed this amount of overkill before. I live in the UK too, I don't think I've ever seen a police man/woman with a gun.
Originally posted by Nova
I'll count myself lucky then
Originally posted by AgentSmith
Oh you mean he could have shot the Police doing their duty?
While I think we should be allowed CS Gas, Tasers, etc I hardly think this is a prime example to be using to further this cause - justifying the killing of police officers in the call of duty.
Anyway a civvy would hardly be a match for trained firearms officers and do you really think he would have survived if he had started shooting them anyway?
Originally posted by AgentSmith
It seems odd that if they were going to assasinate him they would do it so publicy
Originally posted by Nova
I'll count myself lucky then
Originally posted by kode
if anything this is a prime example of how not to cover up.
HOW THE EVIDENCE IS STACKING UP
WHAT POLICE SAID v WHAT THE EVIDENCE SAYS
- Jean Charles de Menezes identified as suspect after leaving block of flats.
- Surveillance officer unable to make accurate identification because he had been relieving himself when de Menezes left.
- Wearing bulky jacket and/or belt.
- Wearing only a thin denim jacket.
- Acted suspiciously on way to Stockwell station.
- Nothing odd in his behaviour.
- Ran from police when challenged at station and refused to obey instructions.
- Challenged for first time while seated on train.
- Vaulted ticket barrier to escape.
- Did not vault. Ran only to catch train.
- Eight shots fired into him.
- Eleven shots fired, three missed (seven to head; one elsewhere).