TheObserver, thanks, I aprreciate that.
DonkeyPlopPlop I do understand. I have understood. I have stated it probably for the 5th time now, I WANT to start a research group to explore this
further. I appreciate the level of intellect here and ask for input hence my bringing it up in the first place. If there are others out there who
build it first, I'll be the first to congratulate them. It all started here is what matters to me.
Yes I agree it needs to go before scientific review. Barring the scientific community (for the moment) you all are my reviewers. I see a concept that
in theory doesn't have the inherent flaw so many design implementations before have had. Are there flaws in my theory? Probably, I am not infallible.
However, as is (or should be) obvious, the math works. There is an over unity available there if we can find the right tuning of the forces and
someday that fine tuning will make it so.
I give the concept and explain the principles that for all intensive purposes looks promising. Deny ignorance and open your minds and just accept this
design on Faith. Get past that stumbling block and lets do this. It will work, I am sure of it. Math is science and without an equation we have
nothing. The equation here is 4>3=perpetual motion. The next theory to be realized from this equation will be what brings us to levitation, propulsion
Believe me, I have looked at the options available with this design and even though I might see more possibilities at the moment than the rest of you,
that isn't to say that someone out there won't see a possibility I overlooked. All it takes is that first step in believing in the design.
Am I breaking the laws with the design? No, I don't think so. I utilize the laws to advantage and in a way that nobody has tried before. This can't
be ruled out just because it hasn't been realized yet. It would be worthwhile to investigate the concept since I see the possibility as do all of you
otherwise you would be hitting me with reasons it wouldn't work instead of asking me to explain it in further detail than can be provided without
Lets start that research here and change the world. Then we can all take pride in bringing this concept to fruition. I gave it to all of you, help me
do it is all I ask. Show me the flaw and I will work around it. As stated (I know, in theory everything works lol) I don't see a problem with this
design and if anyone here does, point it out since I won't know it until it is pointed out. I don't see this as some delusional thinking on my part,
I see the viability of the design. All I/we need is to implement it. This is huge, a diamond in the rough. Can you label it a rock because it isn't
C'mon guys, work with me here. Think for yourselves and picture the motion. All it takes is finding the right combination to unlock. 4 will
overpower 3, its natural. Use the diameter to advantage, thats another natural.
Once we get the basic design tuned we can move forward from there. That is my ultimate goal, not merely making a device for a lightbulb or power
generation. Wouldn't you like to levitate? Or travel beyond the stars and become a member of the interstellar crowd? Who knows what we will learn
along the way and once we are there I am sure they have their own universities if you follow me. We have to learn to crawl, before we can FTL and who
knows, ...time travel? If it is possible we will find it if we can just get past this first step.
For my part I am going to do computations on the various permeations. In time it will become evident. There are only a limited number of possiblities
in a closed system. The starting point is the actual design. We have the framework in front of us. Lets fire this engine up.