Big Problems with the Big Bang..., page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 11-11-2009 @ 02:03 AM by Gakus
Originally posted by RANT
If "Big Bang Theory" was indeed as you postulate, I'd agree with you.

But it's not. I've never seen anyone (but you) call a nearly infinitely dense singularity "nothingness."

Anyway, for those interested in the actual scientific theory here's some resources from wikipedia and NASA.

According to NASA, a priest actually first proposed the theory in 1927 that has become the dominant scientific theory of the day.

It can certainly be argued against, but not by misquoting it and certainly not by pulling "nothingness" out of one's butt, then proceeding to inaccurately name your butt pickings "big bang theory" for the sole purpose of demonstrating both your own ignorance and an unhealthy love of one's own stink.



nothing can be near infinite it either is or isn't =/


reply posted on 11-11-2009 @ 02:38 AM by donhuangenaro
this documentary nicely explains why I question The Big Bang Theory too:









the problem with modern science is it is no longer objective and it is susceptible to manipulation (depending on who is financing it)

there is also a problem with scientists themselves: their arrogant ego and the worry about their public image, instead of pursuing the truth

someone said here that the base for The Big Bang theory is observation, I can agree with that, but when you watch this documentary, you can see what happens when someone have observations that are opposing the mainstream science dogma

cheers!



[edit on 11-11-2009 by donhuangenaro]
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



EVOLUTION - Did YOU Know?
  Posted 19 days ago with 24 member flags
"I was raised an atheist"- Professor František Vyskočil
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
The meaning or point of existence or life
  Posted 12 days ago with 2 member flags
Sand Castles and Science
  Posted 11 days ago with 2 member flags