It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Zipdot
Time and time again, members of this board are baited into playing the role of "teacher," when a cursory glance at WikiPedia or a similar site could easily take the place of pages and pages of replies, wherein members mollycoddle willfully ignorant instigators with myriad links and explanations that remain ignored.
[edit on 9/20/2005 by Zipdot]
Originally posted by RANT
If "Big Bang Theory" was indeed as you postulate, I'd agree with you.
But it's not. I've never seen anyone (but you) call a nearly infinitely dense singularity "nothingness."
Anyway, for those interested in the actual scientific theory here's some resources from wikipedia and NASA.
According to NASA, a priest actually first proposed the theory in 1927 that has become the dominant scientific theory of the day.
It can certainly be argued against, but not by misquoting it and certainly not by pulling "nothingness" out of one's butt, then proceeding to inaccurately name your butt pickings "big bang theory" for the sole purpose of demonstrating both your own ignorance and an unhealthy love of one's own stink.