Big Problems with the Big Bang..., page 2

Dear List,

I come to the question of the big bang from a very different perspective insofar as how I approach the question as to whether an explosion produced the universe.

Because of my interest in original cause, I can use some information most do not use or are entirely unaware of it.

In 1955 a text was published that correlates the physical universe and the spiritual universe as an actual unity. The text explains that our cosmology is not grand enough to understand universe origins much less propose that whatever it was that produced it, became or was ignited and matter resulted.

The first cause of anything exists outside of the system it produces. It has to because all systems are related facts or objects and someone who knows a lot about facts and objects is the one who has to select them to make a successful system. Systems of objects or facts are not spontaneously associated; they have to be placed in a way that the unrelated is not part of them.

According to the text, the universe is in its parts arranged like an atom. There is a nucleus, inside and outside energy fields, and subordinate charges that circulate about the center in a balanced way. In other words, in spite of all the pieces that go to make up an atom, its component parts and their arrangement result in an organized stability.

The master universe - all the universe that could ever be perceived - has a central core which exhibits tremendous gravity attraction in two ways:

1) linear gravity
2) pre-materialization gravity

The first one I assume everyone understands well enough, but the second one is not well known, if at all.

The basic units of matter are not the atomic units we usually think of, but each constituent part of matter is made up of a spinning body that is non-reactive to linear gravity. One hundred of these bodies make up one electron. The loss of one or more these bodies destroys typical electronic identity, thus bringing into existence one of the ten modified forms of the electron.

It is this central core to the universe about which science (and our earth religions) have no clue about because it is so distant and because it is shrouded by horizontal and vertical gravity bodies that appear to have some influence on the master universe’s equilibrium.

Matter in the central core is not dual- dual meaning positive and negative charges- but is of triune organization sometimes referred to as triata. Furthermore, the central core has given rise to the outside, and subordinate, universes which are the ones we view from our earth.

Space is a product, an endowment if you will, originating in the core universe and through the processes of Original Cause, was EXTENDED into the time-space universe levels we see today. No explosion accompanied the appearance of space outside of the core. Space has motion as well as contains motion. Space itself is not uniformly deep as it spreads out from the most gigantic materialization in the universe horizontally and perpendicularly from the central part of the materialization. Picture a huge materialized ellipse nearly as wide as it is long, and along its central edge extending all the way around it, there impinges the stuff of space, very shallow at the central edge and thickening as it extends out toward time time and then again shading out to a very thin thickness of space at the limit of the universe extension.

Space contains force fields in the time universes, or areas of pre-materialized matter that comes forth from the core, and when these fields are sufficiently large, they can be intelligently organized into the vortexes that eventually materialize the force fields into the matter stars are made of and eventually become the nebula that create solar systems and other types of universe phenomena.

A Big Bang is a child’s explanation of how the universe came to be. We will understand what I have spoken here in the future, perhaps in a relatively near future. However, there is no reason why the basics can not be discussed now.

This explanation is in layman’s terms. I am aware of that. Someday science will be able to put it into the terms of its own philosophical meter and measurements and understandings that will be similar in meaning to the above.

The text by the way is the textbook being provided to groups who will make use of this knowledge in the coming century, not only how to harness “zero point energy”, but provide the world a unified cosmic view of the universe we belong to. The book’s title is called “Urantia” which signifies the cosmic name of our planet, but also the name of the Deity of The Supreme, resident upon her from which we have taken our name.

Thank you for your time and I will be glad to answer any questions.