Petrodollar Warfare: Dollars, Euros and the Upcoming Iranian Oil Bourse, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 8-12-2005 @ 05:45 PM by Gools
Iran prepares to sell oil in euros



TEHRAN - The Chairman of the Majlis Energy Commission, Kamal Daneshyar said here, on Friday, that preparatory measures have been taken to sell oil in euros instead of dollar, ... he went on to say that Iran should at the first phase sell its oil in both Dollar and Euro, and then gradually move toward Euro as the mere source.


As for the probable consequences of such a decision, Daneshyar said that when such a measure is taken, the United States would soon realize that it is not the one who can always inflict economic damages on the Islamic Republic and that Iran can also get even with it.

Daneshyar who also represents Mahshahr in the Majlis noted that prior to this the way was not paved for undertaking such a program, adding that fortunately the present government possesses the necessary management bravery to prepare the ground for taking such a measure.
(2 December 2005)


Tick... tick... tick...
.


reply posted on 11-12-2005 @ 04:03 PM by Gools
Israel Prepares Troops for Attack on Iran


ISRAEL’S armed forces have been ordered by Ariel Sharon, the prime minister, to be ready by the end of March for possible strikes on secret uranium enrichment sites in Iran, military sources have revealed.


Interesting timing isn't it?
.


reply posted on 17-12-2005 @ 05:18 PM by Seekerof
Despite the hype surrounding this, especially in relation to the book put out by William Clark: Petrodollar Warfare : Oil, Iraq and the Future of the Dollar, there will be little to no petrodollar or petroeuro warfare because Iran is creating an Iranian Oil Bourse.

My reasoning, correct or incorrect, are along the same lines as this commenter:

What the Iranians are attempting to do is to play hardball with the United States and to suck up to the Europeans at the same time. They’re trying to develop an alternative pricing structure in euros. The problem is that the Iranians don’t have the ability to do it.

First, they don’t produce enough oil to make any difference. Second, the so-called bourse is meaningless because they don’t produce enough oil to even guarantee delivery of the underlying contracts outstanding.

They have no collateral agreement with either the NYMEX or Brent or London oil markets. Without corresponding securities agreements, which they are precluded from having under existing embargoes. It doesn’t give them the ability to make good on the contract outside of their own country. The people talking about this are people that don’t understand exchanges.

They say -- The Euro will be a challenge to the Dollar. We’re going to have $100/barrel oil.

But this is only headline value for the unwashed. In the last analysis, however, the formation of an Iranian oil bourse, as they’re calling it, is meaningless.

Petrodollar Warfare- With Updated Comments






seekerof

[edit on 17-12-2005 by Seekerof]


reply posted on 17-12-2005 @ 08:19 PM by Majic
The Weakest Link

While I consider all this interesting and worth following, the weak link in the theory is the notion that Iran can somehow undercut the world oil markets through its bourse by continuing to offer what amounts to lower prices for oil.

The problem with that thinking is one of classic supply and demand: as demand for Iranian oil goes up, prices will necessarily follow.

Meanwhile, a strengthened euro versus a weakened dollar benefits the U.S. export markets and weakens the positions of nations whose economies depend heavily on exports to the U.S. -- as well as euro-based economies in competition with U.S. exports in global markets.

This can have negative short-term impacts on the U.S. economy, but would quickly strengthen it as domestic production increased to take up the slack in imports.

There's much more to all of it, of course, but that's the point. The world economy is highly complex and diversified, and even the primacy of oil in world markets isn't unchallenged.

OPEC knows this, which is why they carefully manage production quotas to discourage shifts away from their products.

Iran does not have enough oil production capacity to outproduce the rest of the oil-exporting world.

Thus a change in Iranian oil policy may well cause some shifts and temporary market fluctuations, but it is highly unlikely to have the sort of "end of the world" consequences implied.

Also, it would be unwise to think these events will not be managed by the U.S. and its allies for their benefit, and would be ignorant to assume that military intervention is the only option available.

Far from it. Most of the wars being fought today have nothing to do with guns or bombs. Money is the weapon of choice, and is by far the most powerful weapon in the world.

We'll see how this particular battle plays out.

And um, pass the popcorn please.


reply posted on 18-12-2005 @ 10:55 AM by Gools
Thanks for the link Seekerof. I was not aware of the book. I encourage members to read the extracts on that site. As for the opinions of the commenter you cited I have a couple of points to raise.


The problem is that the Iranians don’t have the ability to do it.

First, they don’t produce enough oil to make any difference. Second, the so-called bourse is meaningless because they don’t produce enough oil to even guarantee delivery of the underlying contracts outstanding.
...
The people talking about this are people that don’t understand exchanges.


Bovine feces!!

Oil is currently priced on the NYMEX [New York Mercantile Exchange] and IPE [London’s International Petroleum Exchange]. Both of these countries are net importers of oil! The argument that a country needs to produce the oil it sells on it's exchange does not hold water and shows a high level of ignorance on the part of this commenter accusing others of the same.


They have no collateral agreement with either the NYMEX or Brent or London oil markets. Without corresponding securities agreements, which they are precluded from having under existing embargoes. It doesn’t give them the ability to make good on the contract outside of their own country.


That's an interesting argument, but a red herring IMO. They only need to have agreements with enough producing countries to deliver the oil to the buyers. Iran and Venezuela are two major producers and both are members of OPEC so the supply side may be covered.

As for buyers, Europe buys more oil from OPEC than the US. It only makes sense for them to use their own currency and avoid daily fluctuations in exchange rates. edit: and remember Britain is not part of the Euro, so we are talking "Old Europe" here (I'm sure they've totally forgotten about that one eh?).

The availability of a Euro based bourse is enough for countries to diversify their foreign reserve holdings. That will automatically depress the value of the dollar and increase the value of the Euro (relative to each other at least).


But this is only headline value for the unwashed.


Yeah I'm really tired of the great masses talking about the Iranian Oil bourse everywhere I go.


In the last analysis, however, the formation of an Iranian oil bourse, as they’re calling it, is meaningless.


It's far from meaningless IMO. Ever wonder why the US can keep printing money, running deficits and carry an 8 trillion dollar debt? It's the petrodollar.

I'm not saying the world will come to an end, just that the establishment of this bourse will destabilize the petrodollar economy on which the US relies for it's financial health, and that may be enough to eventually cause a financial crisis of worldwide proportions. Time will tell.

It's planned implementation is also enough for Iran to be targeted by the powers that be. Assuming Europe can keep it together and that the bourse goes live, it may even cause a split in OPEC with Saudi Arabia siding with the US to keep oil trading in dollars and Iran and Venezuela siding with the Euro.

Interesting times ahead at the very least.
.


[edit on 12/18/2005 by Gools]


reply posted on 18-12-2005 @ 07:48 PM by Samsonite
I just thought of something recently. With all the major world countries moving towards the Euro soon, and more being added over the next few decades, could it be safe to say that eventually...the United States will have to join in also?

Could the M3 data being pulled be the Feds way of saying we don't want the world to see us stockpiling the Euro.

Is it possible that a "terrorist" attack could be just the catalyst to push the U.S. currency system towards a more "global" or stable currency like the Euro?

This could just be the first in a series of things to come. First Iran, then all Opec countries switch to the Euro. This devalues the dollar some 25% leading to hyperinflation, and then the U.S. has two options to gain global positioning. War (WW3). Or..switching currencies. Possibly even fading the Euro gradually in.

In an attempt to be more global, the Fed starts printing Euros instead of say 1s. Then eventually Euro 5s. Then employers start giving the option to be paid in Euro's or Dollars...since the Dollar is devalued, everyone asks for Euros.

Just something to consider. This whole Iran thing could be just that catalyst towards a more universal currency.

Not only that, but just the act of the U.S. switching to the Euro alone would send a wave across the currency market devaluing outside currencies I think.

If major transactions and trade is done with the Euro it would be the equivalent of the Spanish Real (years ago). Where merchants would trade in everything else but then close out their banks with the real because of reliability or universal appeal.

This could inturn cause a wave across the currency market leading to Australia and Canada joining in. Then possibly even Japan and China.

Next thing you know, we have a 1 world currency and a true global market.

When you think about it, this is inevitably the best option. The other option would be for the U.S. to somehow tie in Iran's threats on Isreal as a reason to attack them and take control of the region.

So the options become:

1. WW3
2. Devalued Dollar/Hyperinflation/Recession/Depression
3. Changes In Monetary Policy (Universal Stability With The Euro)

The only problem then is, can a gradual move into the Euro truly happen? I would assume that just the mention of the Fed attempting to role out Euros would further crash the dollar.

I'm of course just speculating.

[edit on 18-12-2005 by Samsonite]



reply posted on 22-12-2005 @ 07:18 PM by Gools
Originally posted by mbkennel
Arbitrageurs will keep the price fairly similar to NYMEX or IPE prices after adjusting to EUR/USD futures. If they want to be taken seriously their hub for physical delivery must also be recognized and secure. That may not be so. Where does NYMEX and IPE settle oil?


I don't know how oil contracts are settled. I imagine it's just numbers flying around in cyberspace with ships told where to go for pick up and delivery.

You're right about the price of oil being the same. Having another store just means a bit of price competition, except if that store accepts a different currency, then you have another choice to make. Which currency?


I doubt that pricing oil in euros in Iran will change the structure of the capital reserves. That comes from facts bigger than just the oil trade.


Your absolutely right, it's geopolitical.

I foresee most of the anti-US Arab countries opting for the Iranian bourse, as well as Venezuela and other South American countries, and basically any other country the US has managed to piss-off with it's foreign policy in the last 60 years. It could even lead to a split in OPEC (hmmm... maybe that's the plan?).

Anyway, if all of those countries opt for the Iranian bourse they will need Euros to purchase the oil. How do you get more Euros? Sell all of your dollar assets like Venezuela has done (see above post). I doubt that China and Japan can absorb all of those dollars. That's a lot of dollars floating around with an increased demand for euros.

I'm not seeing the "don't worry everything will be the same" aspect here.
.


reply posted on 7-1-2006 @ 04:42 PM by Gools
China set to dump dollar reserves


WASHINGTON/SHANGHAI - China indicated on Thursday it could begin to diversify its rapidly growing foreign exchange reserves away from the US dollar and government bonds – a potential shift with significant implications for global financial and commodity markets.

Economists estimate that more that 70 per cent of the reserves are invested in US dollar assets, which has helped to sustain the recent large US deficits. If China were to stop acquiring such a large proportion of dollars with its reserves – currently accumulating at about $15bn (€12.4bn) a month – it could put heavy downward pressure on the greenback. MSNBC


China is likely to fully support the Euro bourse and protect it's Iranian energy supply.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^