The Weakest Link
While I consider all this interesting and worth following, the weak link in the theory is the notion that Iran can somehow undercut the world oil
markets through its bourse by continuing to offer what amounts to lower prices for oil.
The problem with that thinking is one of classic supply and demand: as demand for Iranian oil goes up, prices will necessarily follow.
Meanwhile, a strengthened euro versus a weakened dollar benefits the U.S. export markets and weakens the positions of nations whose economies depend
heavily on exports to the U.S. -- as well as euro-based economies in competition with U.S. exports in global markets.
This can have negative short-term impacts on the U.S. economy, but would quickly strengthen it as domestic production increased to take up the slack
in imports.
There's much more to all of it, of course, but that's the point. The world economy is highly complex and diversified, and even the primacy of oil in
world markets isn't unchallenged.
OPEC knows this, which is why they carefully manage production quotas to discourage shifts away from their products.
Iran does not have enough oil production capacity to outproduce the rest of the oil-exporting world.
Thus a change in Iranian oil policy may well cause some shifts and temporary market fluctuations, but it is highly unlikely to have the sort of "end
of the world" consequences implied.
Also, it would be unwise to think these events will not be managed by the U.S. and its allies for their benefit, and would be ignorant to assume that
military intervention is the only option available.
Far from it. Most of the wars being fought today have nothing to do with guns or bombs. Money is the weapon of choice, and is by far the most powerful
weapon in the world.
We'll see how this particular battle plays out.
And um, pass the popcorn please.