I had been selected in the past for a test by the Institute Of Noetic Sciences (www.ions.org) due to my above-average performance in a series of
'psi' tests I did on www.gotpsi.org. The tests were run by a senior scientist in the organization, Dean Radin (PhD). I never found out my results
though, I guess they were kept confidential and put into some report.
Although I would consider myself as having above-average abilities in remote viewing and the typical "pick a card" and "pick a location" type of
psychic tests, I am far from an expert. I am open to the idea that I may just be incredibly lucky... which I suppose may be something paranormal unto
itself though. Either way, I do not perform perfectly 100% of the time. I have my on and off days, but I suppose a golfer may have their on and off
days as well. I also find that after a while of testing, my performance will gradually start to drop. (starts off hit-hit-hit and then I get
bored/tired and it starts to level off.)
I am willing to take tests, in order to perhaps lean things in the way of believing. But I am in no way a "Real" psychic. I haven't done any
training and I don't use any techniques, I just use my intuition. So anything that I do would not be taken as proving or disproving that there are
real psychics out there.
Personally, I believe there are few "ultra-gifted" psychics out there that can get things right all of the time, but I do believe they exist. Most
people claiming to be this though, are just frauds and cons. On the other hand, I believe that every person is capable of a mediocre level of psychic
ability at the least, and that it can be strengthened through practice just like training to run a race, etc.
By the way, I can't do "cold reading" psychic things (like psychic readings where you could pick anything to do with anything). I can only pick
from pre-determined possibilities.
So if nobody better will step up that can provide accurate hits 100% of the time, I may be able to be correct like.. 3/4 of the time or something.
If you can create a controlled and unbiased experiment, I would love to be either proven [Below Average]-[Not Psychic]-[Average (expected % by
guessing]-[Above Average]-[Very above average] or [Psychic]. Because honestly, I don't think I have done enough testing to prove to myself or anyone
else which catagory I would fall under.
I understand if you are looking for a supposed "real" psychic that can guess it right 100% of the time, in which case I can't be of any help.
Don't think I have seen any around here.
Disclaimer: I do not consider myself to be a real psychic.
[edit on 12-8-2005 by Yarcofin]



Lol Dave. I suppose it is quite possible that if people have such bad luck that they are "Anti-Psychics", it could be reasoned that people who
display "Psychic" abilities are just the opposite, and have really good luck. It would be interesting to see after 50 or 100 tests. Do both such
people even out to the "average" level, or does the really bad person continue to do very poorly and the supposed psychic do very well?