It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
...the sun stopped moving
and its intensity of light was reduced to the brightness at daybreak...
Originally posted by The_Final
Actually I believe that snopes.com proved that the story that NASA found a missing day was false.
Snopes: Religion (The Lost Day)
Sorry for the short post but I figured that it was pretty much cut and dry.
Originally posted by edsinger
For the Egyptian account, we find that the French classical scholar, Fernand Crombette,
translated some Egyptian hieroglyphics which tell of Joshua’s long day.
The text starts out with an edict from the king to exempt from taxation those who had been victims of a flood some two weeks earlier. Evidently the flood had been caused by an unusually high tide. The cause, according to the Egyptian hieroglyphics, was: The sun, thrown into confusion, had remained low on the horizon, and by not rising had spread terror amongst the great doctors. Two days had been rolled into one. The morning was lengthened to one-and-a-half times the normal period of effective daylight. A certain time after this divine phenomenon, the master had an image built to keep furthermisfortune from the country.
Hephaistos...grant protection to your worshipers.
Prevent the words of these foreign travelers from having any effect. They are impostors. Let these enemies of the sacrifices to the images be destroyed in the temples of the great gods by the people of all classes. Make life harder for these cursed worshipers of the Eternal.
Punish them. Increase the hardships of these shepherds. Reduce the size of their herds. Burn their dwellings.
Rameses, our celestial ancestral chief;
In a small angle on the edge of the horizon, the sun itself, which had just risen at the spot where the moon was going, instead of crossing the sky stayed where it was. Whilst the moon, following a narrow path, reduced its speed and climbed slowly, the sun stopped moving and its intensity of light was reduced to the brightness at daybreak.
The expanding waters reached the fortified walls constructed by Rameses, the celestial ancestral chief.
The sea swept around both sides of the region behind, sterilizing the gardens as it went and causing openings in the dikes.
A great country had been turned into a wilderness and brought into poverty.
Originally posted by Byrd
The "Egyptian" material is bunk.
www.cartage.org.lb...
Pure baloney.
Originally posted by The_Final
Actually I believe that snopes.com proved that the story that NASA found a missing day was false.
Snopes: Religion (The Lost Day)
Sorry for the short post but I figured that it was pretty much cut and dry.
Originally posted by RANT
Apparently you missed the fact EdSinger was screaming at you in BOLD and quoting scripture in GIANT TEXT, so no that's not going to cut it.
Here's the pertinent sledgehammer Ed was looking for in response to his question.Status: FALSE!
Velikovsky's book brought about quite a bit of discussion on this topic. "The Day The Sun Stood Still," by Eric Larabee was published in Harper's in January of 1950. It was reprinted in the Minneapolis Sunday Tribune on February 5 of that year, with the comment that "The article on this page--`The Day the Sun Stood Still'--will quite probably become the most discussed magazine piece of 1950. It was published in the current issue of Harper's Magazine, and the Tribune is the first newspaper to reprint it. The account is based on a book, Worlds in Collision, by Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky. The article has created such interest in publishing circles that, the Tribune has learned, the editors of Collier's and of The Reader's Digest have other presentations of the same idea in preparation. This Week magazine, which is a section of the Sunday Tribune and twenty- five other Sunday newspapers, is preparing a pictorial presentation of some of Velikovsky's unusual theories which lace together elements of religious beliefs and scientific events and try to explain that once--within the recorded history of man--the sun stood still."5
Gordon A. Atwater, curator of the Hayden Planetarium, wrote at the time, "The theories presented by Dr. Velikovsky are unique and should be presented to the world of science in order that the underpinning of modern science can be re-examined . . . I believe the author has done an outstanding job."6
Another indication of the trustworthiness of Joshua 10:13 can be found in astronomical data. It appears that one full day is missing in our astronomical calculations. On different occasions, Sir Edwin Ball, the great British astronomer, and Professors Pickering of the Harvard Observatory, Maunders of Greenwich, and Totten of Yale have traced this back to the time of Joshua. If we disregard calendar changes and deal only with a chronology based upon solar motion, and go back to the earliest available records, and trace the calendar through to the time of Joshua, the day of Joshua's battle was on a Tuesday, whereas if we compute backwards to the time of Joshua from the present day, the day of the battle would have been on a Wednesday. The day of the month is the same, but it is a different day of the week.
Physics requires that something must cause the Earth to spin faster
on its axis if the days are to be 8 hours shorter. The Earth must get
a 500 mph increase in rotation at the Equator. The impact of an object
big enough to do this would kill every living thing on the planet. We
had formerly considered this option, but it is clearly unacceptable.
That leaves only one other possible mechanism: Gravitational tidal
attraction from a massive PLANET-SIZED OBJECT moving rapidly by Earth
at close distance. The long day of Joshua, as Velikovsky showed, came
about when a planet came near the Earth. It could happen again. But
there is really only one candidate object that could fulfill the days-
shortening prophecies: Mars.
The object cannot be too large, or it would destroy the Earth. It
must be in an orbit OUTSIDE ours in order to FALL past us at a speed
which would spin up our rotation. It must either be in an unstable
orbit, or be easily disturbed out of its current orbit, or both. Yet
it must have enough mass to spin up the Earth.
Like Cuvier, Velikovsky 'uses the Bible as a single source among many of equal merit as he searches for clues to unravel the Earth's history." The charge brought by Sagan against Velikovsky's aims and motives is precisely the same as that he used to describe the early catastrophists and is described by Gould of the attack upon Cuvier.
Velikovsky had become reacquainted with Professor Albert Einstein while both lived at Princeton, and Einstein did read Worlds in Collision, which he often discussed with Velikovsky. What was Einstein's opinion? He stated, 'not once and not twice but also in the presence of his secretary: 'The scientists make a grave mistake in not studying your book [Worlds in Collision] because of the exceedingly important material it contains.' (23) Was Albert Einstein so naive as to believe that Velikovsky was presenting his book, Worlds in Collision, to validate religion, astrology and the supernatural? The week of Einstein's death he was rereading Worlds in Collision because evidence from Jupiter had confirmed one of Velikovsky's predictions.
R.F. Shaw writes in Nature (June 13, 1985, page 536) "Critics have made much of Velikovsky's alleged appeal to the ignorant and also to his supposed religious motivation, something never documented and which I do not find in his books." (emphasis added)