It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Terror attacks that should have happened.. but have not..

page: 3
<< 1  2   >>

log in


posted on Aug, 2 2006 @ 12:26 AM
I do think you make a great deal of since in what you say in the majority of your posts tone 23;that's why I gave you a Wats vote for your last post. It is right on the mark. I to believe the WOT is a facade propagated by the neocon fascists that have illegally usurped the power of the United Stated Inc. I know that many of my other posts here have been inflamatory and offensive, especially towards Musilms in general and Souljah in particular. I do indeed feel a sense of remorse for being so caustic and I do whole heartedly apologize to the Muslims of the world for my lack of consideration and crude mannerisms. I am conflicted in a sense because I truely support the troops of my nation (USA) and am appreciative of all the sacrifices they make doing their duty to protect us on the homefront. However, I have had a change of heart regarding my attitude toward the Muslim community at large. I was deluded by the official sources of information into buying the government's version of the WOT. However, recently I have had an awakening of spirit that has allowed me to see the awful truth that my government has purpetrated on the world community in the WOT. This WOT has been orchestrated to further American hegemony in areas of the Middle East in strategic support of Israel.

posted on Aug, 2 2006 @ 07:35 AM

Originally posted by irontyrant
How about this,
I think the best way to end this war on the little bitch terorists would be to have a unrelenting assault of horrific scale on them. Since they only have reasoning enough to understand viloence..give it to them in spades.
Day one: Unannounced nuclear attack on Damascus,Teheran and Pyongnang
in this attack a total of 3 mega tons per city should be used in order to erase these cities from existance.
Day two : Announce to the Al-qaeda network that they have 36 hours to surrender
Osama bin bobbin cocks or something bad is going to happen.
Day three point five: If bobbin cocks has not been produced then use a neutron weapon to dust Mecca with radioactivity and demand his turn over again.
This time giving the little bitches 24 hours to respond.
If they do not then do a one mega ton ground burst on Mecca and Medina and continue to use nukes until the terrorists stop or are all gone. Inflict enough casualties and they will be unable to keep up their little gambit.

I think this would be the scenario if a large scale attack on the US would happen.

As for Hillary in the White House.....can you say socialism.

You put a week kneed Democrat in office and you will have an attack.

[edit on 2-8-2006 by steve99]

posted on Aug, 4 2006 @ 01:37 PM
I'm happy that the point of this thread wasn't lost all ya'll..

To reitterate.. "If a real war HAD been declared on the US by radical Islam and had even a SHREAD of support by an Islamic state... we'd see attacks like this happening constantly, consistantly and consecutively. Since we do not see them, and we know that our leaders are completely inept and boarder security is a total joke then the threat of Islamic Terror is GROSSLY exagerated and more then likely almost nonexistant."

Actually we've heard this before..

.. so this is nothing new. I just wanted to point out just how easy it is to strike fear and terror in to the hearts of the general population without using airplanes.

BTW, statements like this..

"and seriously people please stop being so specifics with your ideas of the next terrorist attacks this isnt a videogame i wouldnt be the least bit surprised if theyre are people with terrorist ties who read ATS and all you are doing is giving them ideas."

.. are laughable. You have to be kidding me if you expect me to believe that AQ can't come up with their own ideas. YOU HONESTLY THINK AQ is sitting around reading ATS, because they are OUT of ideas? Or that they can't plan TWO attacks at once? THE FRELLING POINT in the first place, and I'm SURE that I stated that in my second post only TWO posts above yours; that "since I'm NOT ACTUALLY IN the biz of killing people and I can come up with all sorts of horrific ideas then the people who actually DO want to conduct these types of ops should have NO PROBLEM coming up with their own plans" and FOR THAT MATTER you might as well tell Hollywood to stop producing because by YOUR logic movies will also...

"Give the terrorists ideas."

For that matter we better close down the WEAPONS and TECHNOLOGY sections of ATS because of course we don't want them finding out about all of our SECRETS.. (lol).


"I don't think any terror attacks should happen. This type of speculation is just wrong."

.. no its not "wrong". Wrong is taking someones words out of context and suggesting that I believe that these attacks IN GENERAL SHOULD JUST HAPPEN. Did you not get the part about "..SHOULD happen IF there IS an Islamic Terror Campaign against the West"? Or did you just decide to ignore that IMPORTANT aspect of the thread after everyone pointed it out (including ME... again.. this would be the 3rd time now) repeatedly? Oh btw, "WRONG" is also suggesting that SOME TOPICS are TABOO and NOT to be talked about.. this is JUST what TPTB who are engineering these wars WANT you to think. Or NOT think actually.

If you can't understand something when its finally broken down to you IN A SERIES of posts (how many times has the MEANING of my inital post been REexplained in this same thread by HOW many people?) then what are you doing here? Please finish highschool english before you try to engage the rest of us in any sort of meaningfull communication. Thanks in advance!

Oh one other thing.. (my god some people just can not see their hand in front of their face, can they?) ..

Charliegrs: ANYTHING to believe that there REALLY is some threat out there out to GET YOU eh? You can't just look at the facts and realize that you've been lied to and the ONLY REASON there HAS NOT been ANOTHER ATTACK is because THERE IS NO AQ and NO Islamic war against the WEST (not for lack of trying BY the west itself). You think they can't PLAN more then ONE attack at a time? My god.

Soulstice: I came up with #1 BEFORE Syriana was released. WTF are you refering to specifically? #6? (lol)

To end on a postive note..

Xmotex / Irontyrant, thanks for letting me know that ATS hasn't become COMPLETELY useless. And..

"Could it be that the Islamist menace is not nearly the threat it's cracked up to be?"

.. could not have said it in less words myself.



posted on Aug, 4 2006 @ 01:42 PM
well, if you guys dont have FBI files...

You do now

posted on Aug, 6 2006 @ 12:23 PM
Right I'm going to use "could" instead of "should" for this.

In my mind I almost expect there to be a Beslan type attack either in Britain or America. Particulaly effective for the terrorists would be several locations at once. If fear is what they are after, I don't see what could be more effective really.

posted on Aug, 8 2006 @ 04:27 AM
FBI files....ha,
That's a funny thought infinite, seeing taht you are a citizen of the UK I am sure you have much more to worry about with your own country's domestic surveillance. As for me, I do not care about the FBI.I will say what I want to say and they can devote any resources they deem fit to watch,monitor or otherwise harrass me. I know the powers of the FBI and their limitations. I am a former United States Federal Law Enforcement officer. I used to hold the rank of GS-7-4 and was about to be promoted to GS8-5 when I resigned from Federal service. The FBI is a fine agency with an important mission. It is just too bad that the lCommander-in-Chief of my nation is so misguided.

posted on Aug, 8 2006 @ 09:37 AM
Are you saying you PERSONALLY ratted us off to the FBI for discussion of possible terrorist scenarios?

If this is true... then you are a scum bag of the GREATEST PROPORTIONS, and you should IMMEDIATELY be banned from this and any other message board.

Is this what you are suggesting? That YOU yourself made a call to the FBI to say...

"Hey! Hey! FBI, I wanna tell you something you already know... there are ... a BUNCH of creative writers discussing the possiblity of certain security measures that should be taken if there was a real threat against our country!! YOU SHOULD DO SOMETHING ABOUT THESE WRITERS!!"

And btw... in my own country, I've been interviewed on 3 seperate occasions by our secret service and deemed a nonthreat. MIGHT have to be something to do with the wheelchair I'm stuck in for the most part, might also have to be with the fact that I've repeatedly mentioned that I have no desire to harm anyone ...

Edit: Major profanity.

[edit on 8-8-2006 by intrepid]

posted on Aug, 8 2006 @ 10:21 AM
In protest to the possible threat that ATS members are ratting off fellow members...

... I'm no longer posting here anymore.

And until this is resolved I suggest you all do the same. You have NO IDEA what the plan is for those of us who actually THINK for themselves, and are not afraid to use the freedoms granted to us by the laws of our countries.

We commited NO OFFENCE in this thread, yet SOME LOVING INDIVIDUAL has decided that BECAUSE we exercised our right to free speech.. and AS I STATED, the ONLY threat to THIS or ANY message board, or ANY GATHERING OF FREE THINKERS is to suggest that ANY TOPIC is TABOO. THAT is the real threat. Not those of us who IN FACT... may have BROUGHT the fact that these types of threats are easily overlooked by agencies like the FBI who MAY be looking for WMD and forgetting that a ONE sniper rifle can be just as horrible to a society TO their attention. IN FACT, the FBI should be thanking US for thinking about what possiblities exist that could cause us harm.... WERE WE NOT TOLD TO BE VIGILANT AFTER 9-11? Were WRITERS not hired by HOMELAND SECURITY to use their imaginations to come up with scearios that the terrorists might themselves think of before law enforcement might?

HOW can I exercise my freedom of speech? Contribute to this site by discussing of topics I DO NOT BELIEVE TO BE TABOO.. and ARE NOT AGAINST THIS SITE'S TOS and yet... here I have to put up with this type of crap?



Edit: Insults removed.

[edit on 8-8-2006 by intrepid]

posted on Aug, 8 2006 @ 09:28 PM
they poisoned the water hole!
there's a snake in my boot!

posted on Aug, 9 2006 @ 04:06 AM
Vis Major X,
Please do not stop posting here. If you do you are only giving a victory to the Thought Fascists who want to keep intelligent discusion from happening. Each and every voice and idea is needed to combat the symphany of lies and deception being promulgated by my country(America). I hope that you can see that infinite's post was just an attempt to punk you out. The FBI cannot do anything to you for excercising your right to speak your mind freely. In fact, the FBI loves Islam , they have allowed Islamicists to get awy with much more BS than Americans.
In fact, the FBI and the Department of Justice extend greater freedom to Islamic terrorists than to American service personnel or American citizens. If you do not believe me then just do a little research into the terrorist population of the ADX -SuperMAX prison. The terrrorists there have more freedom than law-abiding US citizens. US taxpayers ensure that the terrorists are comfortable and the FBI in colusion stands by as a lapdog.Althougth, in dealing with the terrorists the FBI commonly circumvents US law and provides contraband to the terrorists in exchange for so called human intelligence. So what grounds does the FBI have in enforcing any law? I think its a situation of do as I say not as I do.

posted on Aug, 9 2006 @ 05:20 AM
Why you are giving ideas like this? Dont do the thinking work for them, this peoples IP address should be already marked by the NSA for giving such ideas. I though was gonna look at a link with a list, not your own ideas.

posted on Aug, 9 2006 @ 05:32 AM
Well, if you was a terrorist and wanted to cause the most choas and most deaths, you would attack the water supply. Plus you would release deadly biological agents into the air (like the Sarin gas attack on the Tokyo subway system).

posted on Aug, 9 2006 @ 09:51 AM
To be effective, terrorists will hit where they are not expected. The high-rise apartment scenario is technically flawed. This is because high rise building are designed to resist unusual stresses. The scenario may be effective on older low-rise buildingd.
9/11 was not the first time an aircraft was crashed into one of the twin towers. A prefious attempt with a small aircraft created a fire that was limited to two floors. The collapse of the towers on 9/11 was apparently as much of a suprise to the terrorists as it was to the building's designers. I think the terrorists had hoped to hit the building hgh enoughand with enough accelerant that everone on the upper floors would be killed. As I recall, analysis of the rubble indicated the heat from the fire melted mounting structure for the initerial dampeners ( Huge solid blocks of concrete mounted in the top of the buildings to reduce swaying in high winds ) causing the multi-kiloton blocks to fall, wiping out the central core and floors below and effectively imploding the buildings.

posted on Aug, 9 2006 @ 11:22 AM

Originally posted by niklaus
To be effective, terrorists will hit where they are not expected.

A Will Smith concert?

no one, including terrorists are expected to be there

posted on Aug, 9 2006 @ 01:31 PM
drop a match or better fuse at a gas station or a propane storage tank with the valve open/fuel running.
just kill people with a reckless driving rampage in a crowded mall or a concert.
put metal spikes in food at a restaurant.
replace a shipment of medicine with poison.
burn a school when everyone's in the gym for an assembly.
food and water is the obvious one.
and, propane tanks or oxygen tanks are amazingly destructive. just throw one or two onto a pile of burning garbage and run like hell.
take some hostages, kill one or two of them for street cred.
terror is so simple.

i think, if i wanted to scare people, i would use a more anticipatory approach. many red herrings, and few actual terror events. it is the anticipation that is 'terror', and the events are 'horror'.
hmmm. that's what 'the terrorists' ARE doing.
don't forget your duct tape and plastic.

on the bright side, at least the anthrax stopped flowing from the pentagon to upstart dems' lungs.

posted on Aug, 14 2006 @ 03:07 PM
As long as the terrorists don't realize the real seat of power in the world is a corporate campus in Redmond Washington... Ooops

(Nudge Nudge Wink Wink!)

posted on Aug, 15 2006 @ 05:41 PM
Talk about overreacting

Originally posted by Vis Major X
HOW can I exercise my freedom of speech? Contribute to this site by discussing of topics I DO NOT BELIEVE TO BE TABOO.. and ARE NOT AGAINST THIS SITE'S TOS and yet... here I have to put up with this type of crap?

It was clear, to me at least, that poster was making a joke. And yes, this is the internet, we all have to put up with that type of crap. As long as we dish plenty out we'll break even. Relax.

As for the topic, I agree, the threat is way overblown, I'm sure it exists but not to the extent the government wants us to believe. I think most terrorist groups recieve their backing from various governments, and I'm sure it is alot more well known who supports who than our government will let us in on. I also believe there are deals made behind very closed doors between governments that employ certain groups, perhaps unknowingly to them, to help push certain agendas. So I agree, if they really wanted to hit us they would, but never to an extent that will bring down our nation because that's not part of the plan, IMO. For instance if a terrorist group were to start nuking US cities, you can bet the US will start nuking ALL possible enemy countries that could be behind it, we'd take everybody down with us.

new topics

top topics

<< 1  2   >>

log in