It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by siddharthsma
The only difference between these 2 equations is the '1/2' in the Kinetic Energy equation. This means that one of the equations is WRONG !!!
Originally posted by siddharthsma
I sort of Understood what you said Valhall. Thanks
I am coming up with more theories and connections, and I am sure a day will come when no one will find any objections !
Originally posted by T_Jesus
Perhaps before trying to disprove these equations, you may want to take some physics courses. Being a physicist, I kind of laughed at this thread - no offense.
Originally posted by Frosty
Maybe the OP is surprised to find that Einstein wasn't totally original. Though one thing I have found funny is that light (photon) has energy but no mass.
Originally posted by siddharthsma
Sorry, I will never post a topic like this again. I'm really sorry if I wasted your time.
You're all right I don't know anything about relativity and stuff, and so I do mix Newtonian Mechanics with it.
Originally posted by Quest
The whole thing is obnoxious since he hasn't even grasped that he is comparing Newtonian Classical Energy Equations to Relativity.