Call the apostrophe police already!, page


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 7-8-2005 @ 08:25 AM by Tinkleflower
I really don't want to join the Grammar and Punctuation Police (hereby known as GAPP, to differentiate from the clothing company which may or may not be guilty of misusing apostrophes).

But....for the love of all that is good and chocolatey and pure, PLEASE STOP MISUSING THE BLOODY APOSTROPHE!

If a word becomes plural - it does not carry an apostrophe:

If you own more than one hat, you do not have several hat's.
Opinion does not become opinion's, even when you have several.
More than one rant definitely would not give birth to several rant's.
And if there is more than one tinkle, we could certainly not be privy to many tinkle's.

If you see a sign saying "Apple's for sale" - fight back! take out your white-out and remove that offending apostrophe*.

(Unless the sign is referring to Gwyneth Paltrow's daughter, in which case you might want to ask the question, "Apple's what is for sale? Shoe? signed copy of Daddy's cd? Diaper bag?")

So please, don't mistreat your apostrophe. Treat it with care, and love. It will serve you for the rest of your life. Remember that your apostrophe only likes (not like's) being used to denote possession, and occasionally when letters are omitted, like I might say "I can't believe this blatant misuse of that poor apostrophe!".

Thank you, and good day!


* alas, I cannot in good conscience condone the vandalization of someone else's property. Even if it is for a good reason. So don't use white-out to deface a sign, because I'll be blamed, and I'm poor. I can't afford the lawsuits.

One other thing. I realise English might not be your first language. You're forgiven. But if you've been using the language since birth..then jolly well stop this abuse!


reply posted on 7-8-2005 @ 11:30 AM by Klepto
Well, if you do not wish to offend the grammar mnkeys any further then I suggest all follow the simple rules..



1. Join clauses good, like a conjunction should.
2. When dangling, don't use participles.
3. Don't use commas, that aren't necessary.
4. Be carefully to use adjectives and adverbs correct.
5. Don't write a run-on sentence you've got to punctuate it.
6. About sentence fragments.
7. Don't use no double negatives.
8. In letters compositions reports and things like that we use commas
9. Each pronoun agrees with their antecedent.
10. Just between you and I, case is important.
11. Don't abbrev.
12. Its important to use apostrophe's right.
13. It's better not to unnecessarily split an infinitive.
14. A writer mustn't shift your point of view.
15. Never leave a transitive verb just lay there without an object.
16. Only Proper Nouns should be capitalized. also a sentence should.
17. Avoid cliches like the plague.
18. begin with a capital and end with a period
19. Use hyphens in compound-words, not just in any two-word phrase.
20. Verbs has to agree with their subjects.
21. to keep a string of items apart.
22. Watch out for irregular verbs which have creeped into our language.
23. Check to see if you any words out.
24. Avoid unnecessary redundancy.


reply posted on 7-8-2005 @ 04:50 PM by pantha
well, I've learnt something new today. This thread about the correct use of the apostrophe prompted me to wonder why it is used to indicate possession.
Lately , I've had a bit of a mental block when it comes to my apostrophes. I know that they are there to indicate a missing letter or letters, but every time I've gone to type a sentence such as "pantha's grammar isn't up to scratch" , I've been stumped as to whether I should stick an apostrophe in there. I'm afraid there are several posts around in which I haven't.
As I said, I have had a recent mental block over this, and every time I looked at the "pantha's " part of the sentence , I just kept thinking, no, that can't be right, where's the letter that the apostrophe is replacing.
I now have my answer
In Old English the most common ending to show possession (genitive), was to add -es to the root of the word. Here are some examples:

* Beowulfes bearn - Boewulf's (belonging to Beowulf) child
* cyninges wif - the king's wife
* scopes sang - the poet's song

I'm sure you can see how the genitive case has survived in modern English. We no longer use the -es ending to show possession, but we do use the 's ending. The apostrophe replaces the missing letter e!

Not every genitive (possessive) word had an -es ending in Anglo-Saxon, but most did, and so 's became the way to indicate possession.


www.geocities.com...



So I am glad to say that my mental block has now been broken. I can use my apostrophes happy in the knowledge that I am replacing a missing e.
I can't believe that I was having trouble with such basic grammar, and would like to apologise for any other grammatical errors that this post, no doubt, contains. Please be kind and refrain from pointing any out to me and bare in mind that the English o'level that I gained at school is now 19 years old!


reply posted on 8-8-2005 @ 12:19 PM by junglejake
Originally posted by RANT


The Apostrophe Protection Society


Jeeze...You wo'uld thin'k that at's least a marketing company would have's one indi'vidual who kno's gr'mmer. Those example's were hi'-l'arious!


reply posted on 9-8-2005 @ 10:45 AM by nikelbee
I too would like to add my pet rant for the week. Although I thank you Twinkle for standing up for the apostrophe, grammar's little helper. Occasional misuse of the English language is symbolic of our already low reading/writing time and a by-product of our increased cyber culture.

Constant misuse of the English language is a crime people: a cry for help in an otherwise decent post.

Sometimes (and I'm not joking around now) it is very hard to get the point across because the grammar and misspellings are SO appalling, the reader is left shell shocked and is forced to run away to hide under the couch or to watch television; although that doesn't help either as the English usage is just as bad if not worse on the telly.

Note: most speakers of English as a second or third language are more careful and have better grammar than we do and thus don't have this problem.

Ok, here's my rant -

Their vs. There. Get it right people.

Their: Belonging to someone or something. Such as their hats, their coats, their gloves (you get the picture).

There: Not here nor There. This example of the grammar police is neither here nor there and I will write how I want dammit. See how nicely that sounded even though I said something utterly stupid?

Good grammar not only makes you sound brighter but it makes it easier for people to understand you. If you don't believe me read something by someone who has never heard of a comma, or worse an over-zealous comma user.


But alas, I stray from my point:

Here<--------------------------------------------------> There

Then there is they're which is a contraction of they are. Use this one only when absolutely necessary and only when you are sure how to do it. In my opinion contractions should not be abused. Use them gently and sparingly.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Attention ATS, This Is Important
  Posted 9 days ago with 33 member flags
Labor Day Has Been Canceled
  Posted 8 days ago with 21 member flags
Nine Myths About \'Socialism\' In The United States.
  Posted 7 days ago with 20 member flags
Asking for help around here......
  Posted 16 days ago with 19 member flags
Are You All Deranged?! Women Want Rape? o_O
  Posted 19 days ago with 15 member flags
I am tired.
  Posted 11 days ago with 12 member flags
Namaste = pretentious
  Posted 11 days ago with 11 member flags
Gays have the right to marry and always have
  Posted 4 days ago with 10 member flags