It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
mhmm.
Does any of this ring a bell anyone?
It's only a matter of time before they start putting muslims in concentration camps.
Originally posted by devilwasp
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
mhmm.
Does any of this ring a bell anyone?
It's only a matter of time before they start putting muslims in concentration camps.
A) My country may have done that 100 years ago but not now.
B) My country does not believe in that.
C) Bad cheap dig at the UK)
Originally posted by Odium
A) The only major difference between the Prison the House of Lords removed and Concentration Camps was the fact we didn't work them. (Remember difference between Extermination and Concentration Camps.)
B) Doesn't matter what the country thinks, but the ruling Elite and Government.
C) It was a bit low, but it has a point.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
mhmm.
Does any of this ring a bell anyone?
It's only a matter of time before they start putting muslims in concentration camps.
Originally posted by Odium
A) Law Lords rather. (But the House of Lords had them look into it and got involved).
Belmarsh prison - remember?
B) Really? They are the second level of the House and they are still unelected. Remember in 2003 the reform Bill was beat. New peers are created by appointment from the House and the Labour Government still has to get the Bill through the House of Commons in this next session.
C) Says who? You? The people? The unarmed population of our Country? You seem to forget it is the House of Lords, Law Lords and House of Commons which have the major say. Most of which are corrupt already.
Originally posted by Odium
B) Really? They are the second level of the House and they are still unelected. Remember in 2003 the reform Bill was beat. New peers are created by appointment from the House and the Labour Government still has to get the Bill through the House of Commons in this next session.
Originally posted by Odium
A) If they were worked, there would be no major difference. They were holding people, without trial, who they decided were guilty of crimes. Remember that early in Nazi Germany they did this to Communist and Jewish "terrorists" before they moved on to the majority of them.
B) Peoples area? Oh please... come on DevilWasp you are smarter then that. Big business funds every major party and is slowly sharing money equally among each party. If it was the "peoples area" they would run without a party and run for the public and the constituency which they are from and not a party-line.
The Lord Chancellor also has a large say in the Lower-Level Judges and in some respects even in the Law Lords. After all, they need to have been a judge in the lower courts before they can advance. Again selected by the Government as the Queen is primarily a mouth-piece.
If the HoL votes against a Bill it gets sent back to the HoC to be ammended.
C) www.met.police.uk...
And like the weapons we can own could stand up to the Military/Government or even the Police Force.
...come on.
[edit on 7/8/2005 by Odium]
Originally posted by Odium
A) Not so sure. Already one "suspected" terrorist shot dead.
We'll see if that offer is allowed to work ever again or not.
B) Yes, a mount piece.
And how many times have those acts been enforced and used? Remember the Outcry when Blair used the Parliament Act to force Fox-Hunting ban through?
C) Really? But we'll be classed as terrorists now. You assume the Military won't follow orders or they'll split and join any sort of revolt if they began to attack muslims?
Already there has been a sixfold rise after the attacks on people assumed to be Muslims. If something major isn't done, we could easily end up going the same way.
My country may have done that 100 years ago but not now
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
That’s news to me, you had concentration camps a 100 yrs ago? Well, that’s not what I was refering to when I said “ring a bell anyone” but hey , whatever suits you.
Originally posted by Syrian Sister
And ofcource our little friends who burnt the rieghstag fire, CIA/SS-waffen/MOSSAD/MI6.
Are you getting this or am I speaking in code?
Originally posted by malcr
Of course the hate Blair folks have a physcological problem. Their hatred is so intense that they feel oppressed which blinds them to what is actully going on all around them. The language they use is very telling.
Originally posted by subz
But the groups he wants banned are not terrorist organisations but British political parties.
Originally posted by subz
Hizb ut-Tahrir and Al Muhajiroun are British Islamic political parties who denounced the recent London bombings
Originally posted by infinite
They are not political parties.