Originally posted by Colonel
As anyone can see, you & yours still continue to ride my jock and not address the blanket statements of the father of conservatism. I have not
bothered to attack you nor any of the republicans. I go after the ideology and its blatantly apparent that you can't defend it. Again, I expected as
calling me a repugnant isnt an attack? it most certainly is when its not true. i'm not a republican. yet you keeping asserting that i am.
and i have more than addressed this blanket statement BS. one person doesnt speak for an entire group of people. PERIOD. even if he were a
"representative" that still doesnt mean he speaks for everyone in that group as therre are always will be those of a differing view even within the
same group. you should know this. i have adressed this AGAIN. i certainly hope you got it this time.
the ideology you are attacking isnt held by those who accuse of being a repugnant. you feel one persons comments speak for everyone and they simply
and even when we tell you this you just dismiss it as a coverup and its not.
noone speaks for me but me and until you ask me directly you have no idea what MY ideology is, you only assume. and so far your assumptions have been
he is not the father of anything. not in my book anyway. labels are rather stupid meaningless and lead to bigotry, you being a perfect example of
this as you use labels constantly.
my ideology and my agenda is totally unknown to you and always will be but keep assuming, i'm enjoying the amusement you bring.