It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by xmaddness
Okay prepare yourself for some heavy concepts.
Step 1) The difference between relativity and special relativity.
Einstein had 2 theories of relativity. The first theory term just General Theory of Relativity is a theory that involces mass and light and proposed that matter causes space to curve. The famous equation E=Mc^2 was the final outcome of this theory. E= enery, M= mass, c=the constant of the speed of light.
What this equation dictates is that as mass approaches the speed of light, it will turn towards pure energy rather than mass. It also predicts that travel faster than the speed of light is impossible...
Originally posted by xmaddness
Why? As I stated before, as mass (or a ship) approaches the speed of light, the mass will also increase. The amount of power to keep this object going also increases. (because you are going faster and your mass is increasing until you don't have enough power to push this growing mass faster). The theory states that once the mass reaches the speed of light, it then turns into pure energy (or elctomagnetic wave particles i.e. light)
Originally posted by xmaddness
Now on to the Special theory of relativity.
The special theory of relativity adds one more thing to the equation, and was actually never finished by Einstein. (He later called it one of his life's biggest failures)
What did he try to add into it?
Gravity
Originally posted by xmaddness
If I were to build a space ship, and say goodbye to you and fly off to the outer rim (event horizon) of a black hole, my time relative to you would increase. ie one year for me would be multiple years for you. The greater gravity is for me, the slower time will go for me relative to the you in a less gravity situation. This has actually been proven by the Hafele and Keating Experiment. A good explanation can be found here, and info on the experiment can be found here.
This gravitational time dialtion is what many refer to as the "Time machine" syndrome in which one can travel into the future.
Originally posted by Frosty
Some of you talk as if time is a physical object that can be manipulated. I don't understand how time is anything other than from point a to point b. Anyone care to explain or pinpoint certain post?
Originally posted by Harte
Special relativity predicts time dilation, which says a traveler experiencing velocity will "move forward" in time with respect to a stationary observer that remains in the reference frame from which the moving observer has originated.
Outside the train, your brother would see the ball moving at 5mph (speed of your throw) + 5mph (speed of the train) = 10mph. This is apparent and logical.
Intuitively you would think that the stationary observer, looking in through the spaceship window, would measure the speed of the light beam to be c (speed of the beam)+c-1 (speed of the ship)=2c-1mph, relative to him. In fact, the observer measures the speed of the beam to be c, which is less than 2c-1. How do we account for the speed measurement taken by the observer being less than it should be?
This is missleading as anything with an increasing acceleration is approaching the speed of light.
In particle accelerators, particles are traveling at speeds approaching c.
Originally posted by Frosty
Originally posted by Harte
Special relativity predicts time dilation, which says a traveler experiencing velocity will "move forward" in time with respect to a stationary observer that remains in the reference frame from which the moving observer has originated.
This seems to defeat the purpose of relativity by stating two observers in relative reference frames experience different actions, based soley on speed.
Outside the train, your brother would see the ball moving at 5mph (speed of your throw) + 5mph (speed of the train) = 10mph. This is apparent and logical.
Originally posted by Frosty
I don't see this happening unless the ball is thrown at anything other than toward the rear of the train at an angle and not perpendicular.
Intuitively you would think that the stationary observer, looking in through the spaceship window, would measure the speed of the light beam to be c (speed of the beam)+c-1 (speed of the ship)=2c-1mph, relative to him. In fact, the observer measures the speed of the beam to be c, which is less than 2c-1. How do we account for the speed measurement taken by the observer being less than it should be?
Originally posted by FrostyIf I were standing on a carpet traveling 500 mph and shot a bullet out of a gun going 500 mph, I don't think the bullet will hit an object infront of the carpet at 1000 mph. Though maybe it could. Maybe you have velocity mixed with acceleration.
In particle accelerators, particles are traveling at speeds approaching c.
Originally posted by FrostyThis is missleading as anything with an increasing acceleration is approaching the speed of light.
Originally posted by CloudlessKnight
There is no such thing as time...