posted on Aug, 2 2005 @ 01:27 AM
I have a Saudi friend (bona fide royal princess, one of the thousands), which I find tasteless to mention her name, so if this upsets the credibility
of this thread to a subjective mind I'm sorry, we'll move on without you.
I often liked to ask penetrating questions about her culture, as we were good friends, this bothered her not. As anyone would if they had the
opportunity, I asked her about Osama Ben Terrorist, and her knowledge of his motives. What she said I found extremely fascinating, although I didn't
co-sign on her statements, I do believe they carried a level of authenticty. Her statements are as follows to the best of my memory.
(I know the history of Osama with the US so please don't convolute this thread with arguementitive fact busters that do nothing but make me waste
time explaining my seemingly obvious point).
Sorry about that preface, I have been disappointed before.
The summarized version is that Osama was outraged that the late King Faud allowed "Infidels" (US) to have bases on their land during 1st Iraq War.
Which were kept in Saudi for years after, for protection from any Islamic TakeOver. Finally we left and suddenly Saudi was reletively clean from
terror attacks. For now...
Then guess what happened? When US overthrew the taliban, for which they installed, the taliban leaders (who were protecting Osama) came up with a
great idea, they were going to get back at the US in a big way, with Osama's help, because he already had announced his Jihad, atleast in private
against the crucaders, so he organized his Saudi Trustees (hence Saudi Hijakers) to take up residency in America to start their training.
Almost a year went by with this Mission kept secret. Now back to the terror free (For the most part) Saudi Kingdom, who were secretly paying Al Queda
(which they don't even call themselves) millions of dollars for amnesty against attacks. But considering Prince Abdullah's great relationship with
the Bush family, of course they told their big brithers about the ordeal.
Now on to the subplot. The Massaud found out about the plan and made their own preemptive plans. Silverstein made the 7 billion dollar profit from
having fortuitous forsight in buying the lease on the towers six week before the attacks, then raising the insurance to tee. Everyone knows the
rumors about the Jews not showing up for work and a couple buildings that house 40,000, and only 3,000 die. Even if you believe the justifications,
with all the other facts, it seems fishy.
Now back to America. Does anyone remember the Bay of Pigs? How about operation Northwoods, during the Cuban Missiile crisis, where the government
had a plan to blow up the USS MAINE and blame it on Castro to justify an offensive. Anyway, again, The administration found a way to benifit from
this attack as well. I'm not going to reiterate countless conspiracies that have shown up here forever since, but most of them fit into this
template. Oil Wars. Global Conformity. Building 7 being "pulled" The Towers previously laced with Bombs. The Pentagon Conspiracy with the
smaller jet plane. Then how about all the elusive facts that we can never find or have. etc... Actually they almost all fit.
The last bit of news she discussed was meant to be an educated conjucture, althiough I got the feeling she wanted me to read between the lines... She
purposely gave the feeling that the US intervened on the mission because they didn't think they could pull it off, so they help.
Problem, Osama's whole agenda was to take over the royal family of Saudi and declare himself the new islamic leader to the holy land. After 9/11 his
dream was crushed when all the fingers were pointed his way. Now that his profile is too high for that to become reality, he has lashed out against
the beuracracy of the western world and their allies.
Any thoughts? I don't know what to think.
[edit on 2-8-2005 by AnAbsoluteCreation]