...he'd be swearing it's better to elect Arnold than keep Davis!
OK Kids, here's how it goes: you register to vote, you have data set aside on you. It gets sold. Pollsters buy lists, they poll.
Registered voters will vote, unlike your average bumpkin, their opinion on
who they want/don't want for president is sought out.
Bush has never been above 50% on the question: " Would you like to see Bush re-elected?"...never....ever.
In July 2001, it was somewhere in the mid 40%'s.
Yet, most people assumed that the question of approval was the same as reelect-ability....it's not & never was.
A nation allowed to be attacked and fed a stream of fear & kept at a heightened fear level....gosh darn it! they just loved to see
someone/anyone/anything struck out against.
As for the canard " There's no real candidate out there to oppose him" , it's so wrong on so many levels. It's fresh off the pages of FoxNews,
which was fresh from the mouth of Karl Rove. It's another "repeat it until it's true" propaganda mechanism from the Bush camp.
Where it's wrong from the get go is that it assumes Bush is a real candidate himself.....that strawman has less substance than air.
there are very real candidates with very real accomplishments.....and none of them are Liberal. Kerry/Dean/Graham, with Wes Clark as VP....yeah...Bush
has a chance!
Wait!!
He Does!!!
www.americaheldhostile.com...
www.nbc4.tv...
www.americanfreepress.net...
Every company mentioned:
'Pioneer' level Bush campaign contributor.