It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Darkpr0
I would like to bring it to the attention of those who would say that boeing is sunk if this trend continues that boeing is not sunk. Airbus is a significant force in the manufacture of PAX aircraft. Boeing has its hand in the PAX and military development cookie jars, example being the F-35 (I think thats the new boeing one thats a big hit?). It was also involved in the RAH-66 Comanche.
Originally posted by RichardPriceComplete and utter crap. Im sorry, but thats all there is to say about it. You need to stop spouting utter rubbish like this.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
(outside chance it's an extreme deformation tyre/wheel test.)
[edit on 29-7-2005 by sminkeypinkey]
Originally posted by Zaphod58
It's an advantage when you're building a plane in France and all your sections are coming from countries "next door" [/quote
True, it's easier to have all your parts come from countries "next door", but Boeing is probably building parts for planes in Japan JUST BECAUSE IT"S CHEAPER, thus having to lay-off a thousand people.
Originally posted by FredT
Originally posted by waynos
I was going to ask about that too. Can it really be true or is it another one of those myths that surface over the pond without foundation?
JAL has an all Boeing fleet and serves Europe. I doubt the US Government would have kept that one quiet.
True, it's easier to have all your parts come from countries "next door", but Boeing is probably building parts for planes in Japan JUST BECAUSE IT"S CHEAPER, thus having to lay-off a thousand people.
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
Japan has a higher standard of living than the US does; why else does a Japanese-made car cost so much?