Originally posted by mysraki
A joke you say ? Now you are a psychologist yourself interpreting what Maccabee was thinking claiming to be a contactee. Give me a break.
What Maccabee said is said and nobody will reverse that. It's useless your effort to covert and conceal Maccabee statements unless you are some kind
of lawyer for him or maybe a follower.
The man is a well known excentric ufologist who has been involved in dubious cases in the past like the Ed Walters / Gulf Breeze story or the infamous
Canada Guardian UFO Footage etc. His credibility and reputation has been always controversial due to his inconsistent judgements.
Here the situation is clear as water. Maccabee VS. Meier, Contactee VS. Contactee. The same old story repeats again. By the way Billy Meier has never
recognized any other contactee named Adamski, Fry, Menger etc. as legitimate, only himself. According to Meier all contactees of all times
are fakes and charlatans as well as their evidences. Only himself is the
real thing, you see what I mean ? Same old boring story.
Just to clear things I did quoted the (gulp) expression by Commander Maccabee in my post as I just copied-pasted the statements. It seems that
" somebody " convenientelly edited my post for some reason. Fortunatelly
I included the link to the article.
You don't have to be a shrink to see the obvious meaning of Maccabee's statements. Anyone, with minimal thought, can see his comments are made with
mild humor and very tounge and cheek. I seriously don't get how the hell you could have possibly taken that whole diatribe to be literal matter of
facts from Mac. It was very clear that he was simply relaying his own observations and experience with persons claiming to channel aliens. His comment
about him apparently being a contactee was made with gentle sarcasm and an obvious tounge and cheek reference. If you need me to translate, his
meanign was "well, according to my eccentric friends, I am a contactee because they saw me in some vision, but this certainly is a surprise to me,
since the ETs obviously failed to inform me about it, why am I always the last to know, ect ect".
I still think Meiers is a fraud. He is preaching the same silly New Age hippie BS that every other New Age guru is marketing in books and tapes. There
is nothing uniuqe, earth shattering, or original in any of Meier's rantings. Replace Pliedians with "angels", "ascended masters", "spirit
guides", "Etherians", "Atlantians", or "Lord Ramtha" and you could be reading the same New Age fuzzy feely philosophy that has been packaged in
so many different wrappings, but is all the same stuff.
Photographs prove NOTHING. No serious UFO researcher would base any sort of case on photos, or even a large chunk fo the case. Photos, even those that
have withstood scrutiny, are still grey basket material. All the other "evidence" in this case is very unconvincing. I dont see independant blind
lab studies of any materials, or any good scientific investigation of the area where this happened, or any real solid scrutiny period.
And Meier's claims of Men in Black sneaking around and stealing his "evidence" has lowered the likelyhood and credibility of his whole story.
