It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Cheyneys Plan To Nuke Iran

page: 2
0
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 2 2005 @ 09:16 AM
link   
enslaved83 wrote (in the closed thread):


This is something I find interesting since most of the people on these boards probably have never met an Iranian or been to Iran or know the first thing about it as a country. So how any of them can be pro-war I don't know.

This is so true. I was in a position to work for many years with Iranians and Iraqis (among many other people of other nationalities). The Iranians in particular were some of my best buds. I met their families, ate at their houses, swam in their pools and they were some of the most kind and generous people I know. True friends. I hate to think how they might be suffering now.

djohnsto77 wrote:


I wouldn't get all worked up about it...anyway it says tactical nuclear weapons not strategic nukes.

Do you feel safe in knowing that the Iranian government (if capable) will care... and respect the difference? Do you have enough faith in the Iranian government's integrity to know that they won't come back against an unprovoked strike with all the firepower they have at their disposal?

I suggest you get 'worked up', man. If your faith in the Iranian government is misplaced, you could be supporting the demise of the major cities in the US.

[edit on 2-8-2005 by Benevolent Heretic]




posted on Aug, 2 2005 @ 12:57 PM
link   
Have I misread or even read something into an article that simply is not there?

Are you actually suggesting that a democratically elected member of your Parliament - albeit the Vice President, has on his own authorised the planning for an unwarranted, unprecedented NUCLEAR attack on Iran?

What madness is this?

Does he not know the consequences of such an action.

By God you Yanks must arrest these morons who would drag you down into the fiery pits of Hell!

Stop this madnes before it's too late.



posted on Aug, 2 2005 @ 01:26 PM
link   
the vice president had a plan drawn up. it doesn't mean it will be followed or acted upon.

also, it could be possible that this was released to the public with the hopes that the Iran worries enough about it to not sponsor terror acts against us. Ok, go ahead, say "but Crakeur, they don't sponsor terror, we do. we commit the acts as an excuse to attack foreign countries for their oil"

fine but last I checked they have yet to disprove that their president wasn't the guy in the photos of the 1979 kidnappers. they also have yet to stop thumbing their noses at the rest of the world with regards to their nuke program.

Now, I'm not saying we should nuke, attack or even call Iran names if we have another attack on our soil. I'm merely saying this is not necessarily a public statement that we are planning on attacking Iran and making up reasons to do so as we go along. As mentally challenged as our government might be, I can't imagine they would release information that, if actually were to happen, would make it seem like we planned this all along. Rather, you do this covertly, make up a link to Iran and then bomb them. You don't say "Iran will be behind the next attack and we will attack them and prove it later." that kind of stupidity only works (sort of) once.



posted on Aug, 13 2005 @ 10:53 AM
link   
right, but this didnt come form a whitehouse press conference. If it was an official announcement then yea i would question the motives for it, like i would any offical press release.

Also i dont think they have drawn up any plans to nuke St.Lucia or somewhere after the next 911. The plan and its target have significance, they show the thought process.



posted on Aug, 13 2005 @ 11:01 AM
link   
You know, (we need a smiley that shakes its head) this is just too much and i certainly hope there is such a thing as divine intervention and that these so-called leaders get what they deserve.

I', glad i'm being protected.



posted on Aug, 13 2005 @ 11:55 AM
link   
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!!! Yeah I said god not allah. Enough with the freaking muslim love-fest you little panty wastes have going on here. The only group that had anything to do with 9/11 was a group of muslim extremists!!! Plain and simple you dunder heads. It wasnt the US Gov..or Bush...or UK...or Elvis...not fat Elvis but suave young Elvis. If you little minded arab-hugging liberal tow boys and girls can't fathom the fact that maybe just MAYBE the poor, isolated, abused little old allah praiser could do this then you need to get your head out of the free world sand and move your sorry carcuss to the middle east sand and see just how much love there is over there for you. If Iran viloates the nuclear rules set up by MULTI nations years ago, or they have the slightest thing to do with an attack on MY soil I say nuke the sons of b****** till the sand all melts into one big glass ground cover. If that Iranian president turns out to be one of the terrorists involved in the USA hostage taking siege of the 70's then maybe we throw a couple of good old ICBM's at his palace. KA - BOOM. Now lets see you take a hostage...or plant a roadside bomb...or hang women on soccer fields...or strap a bomb on a school girl and put her on a bus. KA - BOOM. Wake up people and realize that that the true terrorist is from middle east decent and the true terror is your liberal a** kissing ways that will get us all killed. Just my humble opinion for all you french-wannabees to read! The time has come to decide 'do you want to live..or do you want to be politically correct'. I choose my way of life thank you very much!!!!!

Peace out



posted on Aug, 13 2005 @ 12:01 PM
link   
Dick Cheyney is in the building!



posted on Aug, 13 2005 @ 12:03 PM
link   
So according to Cheney China can declare war on us and attack us so we would NUKE IRAN!

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, neither did Iran, it was all Saudi and Afgani, no Iran or Iraq touched it. hell Saddam and OBL hated each other! OBL thought Saddam was to much of a softie.

So now we are going to nuke a foriegn country because we pissed off Saudi Arabia and they attack us. What? They don't care who it is, they are saying that "Oops a plane missed it's landing strip and crashed must be terrorists." They push the button and nuke Iran. No proof of terrorism just "Like terrorism". Hell in a hand basket and the republicans are carrying it, thanks to the likes of EdSinger and CazMedia and Deesw.



posted on Aug, 13 2005 @ 12:07 PM
link   
Please read my statement carefully..I never said anything about China...I never stated that Iran or Iraq had anything to do with 9/11. I said muslim extremists...if you choose to connect the dots like you just did..then fine ...I never said what country was involved. Read the post as to what I said should be behind a good ole USA nuking of iran.

edit=to hide my true identity

[edit on 13-8-2005 by SOCIAL_TAKEOVER]



posted on Aug, 13 2005 @ 12:11 PM
link   
Why are those who are so willing to accept whatever their massah tells them so aggressive? What do you hope to gain by joining this board and spouting off like a wannabe Sergeant Hartman? I don't understand you people. Your govs fugg up royally and you are so willing to go along with everything they say in order to correct their mistakes. Even go risk death to do it for them. That is so very sad. Does anyone else find that sad? It really gets to me. How can people be so stupid?

Edit: ok, the PETA thing was just lame. These people even recycle old, known, irrelevant jokes and try to pass them off as original. Yeah, "dude", we were born yesterday.

This guy isn't even worthy of Troll status.


[edit on 13-8-2005 by cargo]



posted on Aug, 13 2005 @ 12:15 PM
link   
i know and they ask how could Hitler do what he did, yet the answer presents itself suprisingly often.
Just imagine if one of these people is actually in control near the top somewhere.



posted on Aug, 13 2005 @ 12:21 PM
link   
Mod Edit: removed personal attacks.

[edit on 14-8-2005 by UM_Gazz]



posted on Aug, 13 2005 @ 12:26 PM
link   
takeover, your spot on with what you say imo. ther is a war going on, and these terrorists are scumbags and we should nuke the lot of them.
but there is one error of judgemnet, they are not all arabs, most of them are washington nazis, they are just pretending to be arabs to fool people.
most ciminals dont make it obvious its them thats guilty.



posted on Aug, 13 2005 @ 12:26 PM
link   
takeover, your spot on with what you say imo. ther is a war going on, and these terrorists are scumbags and we should nuke the lot of them.
but there is one error of judgemnet, they are not all arabs, most of them are washington nazis, they are just pretending to be arabs to fool people.
most ciminals dont make it obvious its them thats guilty.



posted on Aug, 13 2005 @ 01:03 PM
link   
Now it gets interesting ...

"Germany attacks US on Iran threat

German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder has warned the US to back away from the possibility of military action against Iran over its nuclear programme."
Source.

What next then ?



posted on Aug, 13 2005 @ 01:04 PM
link   
seriously dumbass, thats where they are. Its not Bush or Kerry im talkin about



posted on Aug, 13 2005 @ 01:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by SOCIAL_TAKEOVER

Listen you tree-hugging lil smarmy piece of phlem..[etc. etc.]


Firstly, it's "Phlegm" not "Phlem". Secondly, I'm not a Democrat, let alone American.

There is an adoption program here at ATS where members who have been here for a while can take newbies under their wing. Would you like to be my newbie? I have always wanted my very own little simpleton.

[edit on 13-8-2005 by cargo]



posted on Aug, 13 2005 @ 01:28 PM
link   
I have no clue why people can not discuss matters or topics without resorting to name calling or rhetoric filled innuendos: "tree-huggers" or "dumbass" and etc.?

In doing so, you forfeit your position and argument, simple as that. :shk:




Getting back to the topic, Cheney's plan is nothing more than a contingency plan. This is the norm with the government and the military.





seekerof



posted on Aug, 13 2005 @ 01:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by AdamJ
seriously dumbass, thats where they are. Its not Bush or Kerry im talkin about


And you really believe that some skin head neo's in Washington control ANYTHING or have the ability to compell international policy...whoa there lumpy...who's the dumb a!! now! Think about it...for the love of god man that statement about the nazi's in DC...you need your prozak charlie...time to up the dose.

[edit on 13-8-2005 by SOCIAL_TAKEOVER]



posted on Aug, 13 2005 @ 01:35 PM
link   
when someone calls names at you, its very tempting to do the same back.

back on topic
you are assuming that it is nothing more than a contingency plan i suppose, is their anyway to tell one way or the other?
just like the drills that turn into reality.

Also do they have a contingency plan to nuke Iceland?




top topics



 
0
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join