Sandia Depleted Uranium Study: No Serious Health Risks Found., page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 27-7-2005 @ 12:19 AM by Seekerof
Originally posted by ANOK
They have discovered high concentrations of Anti-Squaline antibodies in vets linking GWS to the Anthrax vaccine used...

www.autoimmune.com...

I will be going through my 3rd GWS evaluation next week, 2 days of MRI's (yuk!) and tests...I will be asking about Squaline/Anthrax...


I am currently doing some research on that, ANOK.
Good point you raise.





seekerof


reply posted on 28-7-2005 @ 06:07 AM by Seekerof
Grinning like a big dog.....
Souljah?
You are aware that you have provided two links [above] that I have already provided on page one that agree, not contradict, with the Sandia Deplted Uranium Study: No Serious Health Risks Found?

And that another three of your above links only mention that their is a possibility, meaning 'a chance of', 'maybe', 'possible', 'might', 'could', 'not sure', etc?

Your efforts are always appreciated though, Souljah.


Here's a little more on that Sandia 2-Year Study:


Marshall’s study concluded that the reports of serious health risks from DU exposure are not supported by veteran medical statistics nor supported by his analysis. Only a few U.S. veterans in vehicles accidentally struck by DU munitions are predicted to have inhaled sufficient quantities of DU particulate to incur any significant health risk. For these individuals, DU-related risks include the possibility of temporary kidney damage and about a 1 percent chance of fatal cancer.

Several earlier studies were carried out by the U.S. Department of Defense, by University Professors Fetter (University of Maryland) and von Hippel (Princeton), and by an Army sponsored team from Pacific Northwest National Laboratories and Los Alamos National Laboratory.

The conclusions from the Sandia study are consistent with these earlier studies. The Sandia study, however, also includes an analysis of potential health effects of DU fragments embedded as shrapnel in the bodies of some U.S. veterans. The Sandia study also looked at civilian exposures in greater detail, examined the potential risk of DU-induced birth defects in the children of exposed individuals, and provided a more detailed analysis of the dispersion of DU following impact with a number of targeted vehicles.

Sandia completes depleted uranium study






seekerof

[edit on 28-7-2005 by Seekerof]


reply posted on 28-7-2005 @ 07:51 AM by Tinkleflower
Australian risk assessment document

UK site addressing DU issues

Canadian site addressing DU

In summary:

We still cannot say with any certainty whether or not DU represents a tangible health risk; it's just too early to really draw anything but "maybes", "coulds", "perhapses" and the like.

Common sense suggests that yes, depleted uranium can't be good for you - and it probably does represent an increased risk of developing certain conditions; but until we can actually provide a definitive link we're really no more knowledgeable today than we were yesterday.

(disclaimer: no conspiracies, biases or ambiguities were hurt or mistreated in the production of this post)
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



ALL ATS`ers are terrorists
  Posted 5 days ago with 10 member flags
CNN Endorsing Terrorism
  Posted 9 days ago with 7 member flags
Obama\'s terror Drones.
  Posted 7 days ago with 6 member flags