posted on Jul, 25 2005 @ 02:08 PM
posted on 25-7-2005 at 07:46 AM
The artifacts you are talking about are comming up because his head is highlighted by the sunlight streaming in from the windows behind him. That is
why it looks like his entire head was 'plopped' onto a body.
And, really, if they had someone in particular that they wanted to blame it on, why would they just do a crappy photoshop job and just drop the head
I mean, if you are citing a government conspiracy, you'd need to do a little more than 'this looks photoshopped'. I doubt that the 'vast evil
shadow government' uses photoshop specifically and that they do such crap work that it'd be 'obviously fake', if they even existed that is.
Certainly you'd need to site some sort of convicning evidence in order to be able to say that the frame is photoshopped. Also, we're talking about a
single frame in a video series, so the whole thing'd have to be faked.
Have you seen the full video? Who has?
I mentioned nothing of a shadow government.
The initial reports of the first London bombings were that they were military grade explosived that went of nearly simultaneously. There were also
"exercises" planned on the same day, in the exact locations. This information alone is enough for anyone to be skeptical of the "official
I'm not one to scream conspiracy at every questionable piece of "evidence", however.. TWO images of this man are of questionable validity. This
photo, and the one in the related thread. What are the odds?
[edit on 25-7-2005 by hypomonk]