posted on Jul, 25 2005 @ 01:06 AM
Originally posted by bsbray11
My personal opinion, though, is that the side that's doing the most questioning is starting to uncover the truth in this case in particular.
I said in a differnent thread:
"I find it odd how people are so easily offended by the conspiracy type ideas. "Conspiracy theorists" are a large part of what keeps things in
check. If there weren't people out there asking, "well what the hell, that doesn't make any sense", then who would stand in the way?"
So, barring the fact that we are right, what is the harm in asking questions? If we are wrong, they should be answered and dismissed -- everyone of
them. But, similarily to the "Does this make any sense to you?" thread, even the most remote questions, such as; "why iraq?" can't be answered.
Even funnier, the same type of people who admit that Iraq was a bogus cover on here still defend it on most sites.
Why? Because on ATS, they are defending a subject that is much more incriminating. On most sites, these people are defending easily debatable and
But I garuntee that if you put anyone who admits to Iraq fraud in a different site, they say Bush is right and we are winning the war on terror.
That just seems to be the way of thinking.