It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by All Seeing Eye
No, I have paid attention to what has been said about LBJ. So he only went to one meeting, good. But that dosnt effect what my conclution is. THAT HE USED MASONRY FOR HIS OWN ADVANTAGE. Im not claiming he was a 33rd, or it was a masonic conspircy. In LBJs case I only claim he used masory and the oath of the other masons. Big difference.
Originally posted by All Seeing Eye
Yes, LBJ wasn’t a high level mason. But in that one meeting he learned all he needed to know about the brotherhood, and how to use it.
Originally posted by All Seeing Eye
Yes, LBJ wasn’t a high level mason. But in that one meeting he learned all he needed to know about the brotherhood, and how to use it.
LBJ knew the masons disliked Kennedy because he was a catholic. So it was a natural to use the brotherhood to take the fall for anything that might be discovered.
As you said, LBJ was not a mason but he learned quickly how the oath could be used against the brotherhood and for his own rise to power. Hence, the rumors of a Masonic conspiracy.
The fact of the matter is that LBJ packed the warren commission with masons. Masons who had one weakness, and one that LBJ exploited to the max. An oath to the death, to each other, regardless!
Originally posted by All Seeing Eye
Once again you speak for all of freemasonry. Just a few posts ago you said you
One need look no further than the Masonic publications to find the Masonic
lunatics who might want Kennedy killed.
Originally posted by wiggy on 24-7-2005 at 13:40
He is looking for information to back the claim that Kennedy was assasinated by Freemasons, and the warren commision was comprimised of masons to cover up the masonic ties.
More freemasonrywatch rubbish.
Originally posted by All Seeing Eye
One need look no further than the Masonic publications to find the Masonic
lunatics who might want Kennedy killed. The level of hostility that
Freemasons felt toward Kennedy was documented in February 1960 issue of
New Age magazine, a Masonic publication, where Luther A. Smith, Sovereign
Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite, Southern Jurisdiction, told his
readers:
"whatever bigotry is in evidence in the United States is exhibited solely
by the Roman Catholic hierarchy; that the Canon Law of the Roman Church
and the directives of the Pope validate the fears of the people that the
dual allegiance of American Catholics is a present danger to our free
institutions, and lastly that the people in passing upon the
qualifications of a Catholic candidate for the Presidency will be guided
by their knowledge of history and their great store of plain old-fashioned
common horse sense, and their innate caution not to gamble when their
LIBERTIES AND THE NATIONAL SECURITY ARE AT STAKE (emphasis added). "
Originally posted by All Seeing Eye
Once again you speak for all of freemasonry. Just a few posts ago you said you couldnt do that.
The author of this page seems to be at odds with your position on catholics. Do you still speak for all masons?
.
No, this is the stand that I take. How the hell can you assume that I am speaking for Freemasonry?!? You really need to understand that Freemasons vary as much as any other group of people, and nobody speaks for the entire fraternity
"whatever bigotry is in evidence in the United States is exhibited solely
by the Roman Catholic hierarchy; that the Canon Law of the Roman Church
and the directives of the Pope validate the fears of the people that the
dual allegiance of American Catholics is a present danger to our free
institutions, and lastly that the people in passing upon the
qualifications of a Catholic candidate for the Presidency will be guided
by their knowledge of history and their great store of plain old-fashioned
common horse sense, and their innate caution not to gamble when their
LIBERTIES AND THE NATIONAL SECURITY ARE AT STAKE (emphasis added). "
Originally posted by All Seeing Eye
When you say things like, NO MASON.......... You are speaking for all.. Am I wrong?
My point is that even masonry has loose cannons, accept it.
Originally posted by All Seeing Eye
No, I have paid attention to what has been said about LBJ. So he only went to one meeting, good. But that dosnt effect what my conclution is. THAT HE USED MASONRY FOR HIS OWN ADVANTAGE. Im not claiming he was a 33rd, or it was a masonic conspircy. In LBJs case I only claim he used masory and the oath of the other masons. Big difference.
mastermason.com
Lyndon Johnson received his first degree on October 30, 1937. After receiving the degree he found that his congressional duties (elected in 1937) took so much time he was unable to pursue the masonic degrees.
Originally posted by All Seeing Eye
As I said, I believe he used the oath of the masons he appointed. Are you not oathed to help brother masons even to the point of betraying your own integrity? I believe this is what LBJ counted on. Masons will take care of masons, just like you came to the aid of good ol seb.
Im not arguing whether LBJ was a EA or a 33rd. Im saying he had enough info about the oath to use it to his advantaqe.
Originally posted by All Seeing Eye
Are you not oathed to help brother masons even to the point of betraying your own integrity?
Im not arguing whether LBJ was a EA or a 33rd. Im saying he had enough info about the oath to use it to his advantaqe.
Originally posted by All Seeing Eye
Im not saying he was expecting to be accepted as a mason, he didnt have to , he was the president. Those masons didnt come to LBJ, they were ORDERED to preform.
I wouldnt put it past him to use anything or any one for what he wanted. Even masons!
President Lyndon Johnson asked John J. McCloy to serve on the Warren Commission. No less than nine presidents had called on the Wall Street lawyer for special assignments, yet he was little known to the public. McCloy said he entered the investigation "thinking there was a conspiracy," but left it convinced that Oswald acted alone. "I never saw a case that was more completely proven," he asserted.
McCloy had long been involved in the murky world of espionage, intrigue and nazis. He spent the decade of the 1930s working out of Paris. Much of his time was spent on a law case stemming from German sabotage in World War I. His investigation took him to Berlin, where he shared a box with Hitler at the 1936 Olympics. He was in contact with Rudolph Hess before the Nazi leader made a mysterious flight to England in 1941.
Originally posted by All Seeing Eye
Is this someone we really wanted on the commission? Someone who sat with Hitler? Who in reality was a Nazi sympathizer? No ifs and or buts, this guy was a nazi!