um im utterly confused today
i woke up and find this Bigfoot hoopla on SBC/Yahoo news
its a very widely used newssource by alot of people
and they are reporting Bigfoot on the front page!
um from my point of view; these guys have no right to do this without evidence
i dont think they have any hard evidence....
but they might ; i dunno
i first saw it on the front page here
the article is here
it shows some numbers about search trends on internet
some quotes about the "Buzz"
-- "After a recent appearance in the Yukon, the ever-elusive Bigfoot stepped up 24% in searches this week. Meanwhile, his alter ego, Sasquatch
--the Yeti. Interest in the abominable snowman climbed 94%
--Next, we checked into the Chupacabra. The fabled goat sucker is up 11% in search this week
--the Loch Ness Monster. Buzz on the mythical Scottish creature is sinking, down 5%.
the buzz links us to "the recent appearance" which is supposedly caused a massive search / they also supposedly have a strand of hair they will be
DNA testing - they think it might be a bison tho
"A scientist plans to do a DNA test on a hair that is said to come from a sasquatch."
Ok my main point of view on all this is....
why would SBC/yahoo risk losing credibility by reporting a possible hoax?
if u check around the crypto forum; u will notice literally dozens of bigfoot sightings all the time
it happens at least a time or two a Week!
well; i know its unlikely but i hope their DNA tests show something remarkable...
but i doubt we are that lucky
anyways what do you guys think about the buzz?
do you think they are screwing their own credibility?
or are they improving their credibility by reporting on mysterys?
is this a hoax or for real?