NEWS: London On High Alert After New Explosions..

Absolutely!!

Well said. We also had to put up with this back in the days of the IRA attacks. Nothing new for us unfortunatly, new times, new enemy.

Originally posted by AgentSmith
Absolutely!!

Well said. We also had to put up with this back in the days of the IRA attacks. Nothing new for us unfortunatly, new times, new enemy.

Due to a challenge , I am working on the Irish conflict as a manipulated affair
Same bloody enemy, the UK Government, whoever's in power
A statement shortly to be made illegal as the 'indirect support for terrorism' legislation is rushed through as a result of this little replay

Originally posted by AgentSmith
Cool, glad they published that fact - now the terrorists know why it didn't work.. good job MSNBC and the rest of the media!

(Absolutely no disrespect to you darkelf btw)

None taken, but please don't confuse reported news with fact.

[
Where's Roy Robinson Stewart today?

Roy's been screwed on surfing channels much as he has been by the likes of you here
Give the guy a break He richly deserves it

328. London bombing (2) (7/17/05)

London blasts was planned by intelligence.

1. Government knew in advance.

Re: Israeli Embassy in state of emergency

By Associated Press Thursday, July 7, 2005 - Updated: 09:42 AM EST

JERUSALEM- British police told the Israel Embassy in London minutes before Thursday's explosions that they had received warnings of possible terror attacks in the city, a senior Israeli official said. Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had planned to attend an economic conference in a hotel over the subway stop where one of the blasts occurred, and the warning prompted him to stay in his hotel room instead, government officials said.

news.bostonherald.com...

Re: Israel Was Warned Ahead of First Blast
www.israelnationalnews.com...

2. An almost impossible coincidence. A London Underground Bombing 'Exercises' Took Place at Same Time as Real Attack

A consultancy agency with government and police connections was running an exercise for an unnamed company that revolved around the London Underground being bombed at the exact same times and locations as happened in real life on the morning of July 7th.
www.prisonplanet.com...

3. Change and censorship of information in media

#1 was later changed.

Re: "Who Stands To Gain? Israel Warned, Cover-up In Progress
Propaganda Matrix | July 7 2005

BREAKING: Scrambled cover-up to try and change prior knowledge story.
Original reports stated that Binyamin Netanyahu was warned BEFORE the first blast, now all the Associated Press reports are being changed to say he was warned AFTER the first blast, for example this article .
The article linked below that we saved in our own format (and the website that carried it has strangely since crashed) said that Netanyahu was warned before the first blast.
Israel are now denying they got a warning.

BREAKING: Scotland Yard says it got a warning before the attack and told Israel.
"The Israeli Embassy in London was notified in advance, resulting in Finance Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel room rather than make his way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first explosion, a Liverpool Street train station, where he was to address and economic summit."

www.propagandamatrix.com...

#2 is important truth in London bombing case Because the chance for such coincidence is almost zero. Seldom we saw a report of this truth in mainstream media.
There was no necessity for media to fake a news of #1. But there is a strong motive for intelligence to deny and censor #1 and #2 if the bombing is an government planned one.

4. Lack of accountability that four dead "bombers" willing to die. The neighbor said the dead suspects were nice people. One has a baby of 8 months old and was a teacher of disabled children. Is that too convenient to say they all willing to suicide? Or more reasonably, those four men thought they were going to take part in an anti-terror exercise?

5. Unnecessary to die. Even if they were Islamic fanatics, there was no necessity for them to die. Suicide bombing happened when no other means could be used in high security alert situation. London until then was a peaceful city. There was no intensive alert. They could easily leave the bomb in train and get away. Even Al Qaida was not so stupid for such an unnecessary sacrifice. (btw, 10 pound bomb is a small object. It could be easy to fix in a shopping bag or hand bag. It couldn't be bigger than 2 of 5 pounds sugar pack which you can see in super market. It's totally unnecessary to have a big backpack like the dead suspects had in the picture. That's one of my doubt.)

6. The most absurd thing is there is no motivation. What was the purpose of bombing? Who was the target? The victim of London bombing are ordinary people. If it was an Al Qaida operation, then there are plenty of Jewish target, government target in London. Did they pick up wrong "enemy"? Who benefits from such attack?

If you don't have your mind fixed on information government and media set up for you such like " The suspects are suicide bombers", "Al Qaida links".A simple question will lead you to another point of view. The question is:

"Why four British citizens 'sacrifice' their own lives to kill other ordinary people? Who benefits from such attack? Al Qaida or Zionist controlled government?"

And why today
Why didn't the explosives work
Because they weren't supposed to
Why did one person look with dismay at his backpack, because he didn't know it was going to do that
This is the most unadulterated crap story and they are going to provide the cover story soon
Don't believe a word of it - they are going to produce their NWO catalyst soon - sooner than most of us imagined
The Work of Ages is upon us
The muslim ghettos in the UK will feel the impact first
The rest soon to follow

[edit on 21-7-2005 by dh]

Any sceptic worth his salt will not be sucked into drawing conclusions from the 'style' of the bombing (e.g. it couldn't be from the same source as last time because it was a botch/nail bomb/european suspect)

I notice that many people are saying that it must have been done by 'amateurs' . . . . . . this is a rash assumption. . . . . . it could just as easily be a professional job made to look like amateurs.

For the Blair govt, this bombing is convenient because it looks so amateurish that they are less likely to be seen as suspects by the herd, and also it takes the heat out of public suspicions as to their involvement in 7/7.

This is already happening here on ATS as the 7/7 threads have been moved out of the way and virtually quarantined

It's ok Roy
It's tied the 911 and 7/7 things together
Shame it's left out M11 Madrid, Bali, Iraq UN bomb, Turkish bombing of HSBC and other related British interests when Bush, Blair, HM convened before and so on
I agree it is splicing topics into further and further divisions, when they're all ultimately related
Still we can cross-reference
Glad to see you back

[edit on 21-7-2005 by dh]

Yah - come on say it - soon by saying the Government did it , we will be accused of giving aid and comfort to the terrorists and subject to immediate imprisonment or house arrest and tagging
Indirect support to terrorists

Originally posted by VelvetSplash
Sky News just showed the man being arrested by police, couldn't work out his nationality (white probably, or very light Asian), he had a black top on (it looked open) and he had dark hair, with dark glasses on.

[edit on 21-7-2005 by VelvetSplash]

Sky News said that person was later released and had nothing to do with it.

CENSORSHIP ALERT
ON GLOBAL IGNORE FROM THE OWNER

This all bodes well for Congressional supporters of the Patriot Act. They have already used the London attacks as reason to extend the Act. "If it can happen twice in London, the surely it can happen here. And that's why we need the Patriot Act." Fantastic timing I must say.

A quote from that McClellan idiot today:
"I think you heard the President talk about it yesterday. The threats we see from terrorism are not coming to an end, nor should the provisions and tools that the Patriot Act provides our law enforcement and intelligence personnel. The Patriot Act has helped us to break down the wall that existed between law enforcement and intelligence where they could not share information. Now they're able to share information and be in better position to connect the dots and prevent attacks from happening, or disrupt plots for attacks.

I think there is a great op/ed in today's USA Today by Michael Battle, the U.S. Attorney who was involved in overseeing the efforts to disrupt the plot by the Lackawanna Six. And he talked about how important the tools in the Patriot Act are to helping us defeat the terrorists and prevent attacks from happening in the first place. And so we continue to urge Congress to move forward and renew all the provisions in the Patriot Act."

Reports stating a suspected suicide bomber has been shot by police at stockwell station....

breaking news..

Scotland Yard have confirmed that a man has been shot.

An eye witness on the BBC said five shots were pumped into the man.

The witness said it was an asian guy wearing a baseball cap and a thick padded coat which seemed out of place in the summer ....

Reuters reporting that British police have surounded an East-London Mosque.

Sorry, I was redundant.

Also, just read that the Patriot Act has been renewed by the House.

[edit on 22-7-2005 by Astronomer68]

[edit on 22-7-2005 by Astronomer68]

Combination picture taken from Closed Circuit Television and released by London's Metropolitan Police on July 22, 2005, shows the four suspects sought by police in connection with the attempted bomb attacks carried out on July 21, 2005 in London. Police shot dead a man at a south London Underground station on Friday as they hunted for bombers who struck London's transport network a day earlier.
REUTERS/Metropolitan Police/Handout

Yahoo News

Whoever says there are too many CCTV cameras around can . This proves we need them and they are useful. I know it did not stop the bombers but if the PD catch them it could deter othes.

in a nutshell, to all the punks, rebels, yobs, hoods, whatever...police are high strung. Try to avoid your usual self-important, "the world must accept everything I want when I want it and to hell with society and others" crap. When the cops say "stop", do it. Shut your pie hole and can the insults. Try for once, copperation and respect.

Or not. Go ahead and run from police, carry bags and run or throw a fit when they are searched. Then when the cops gun you down, Darwin has his laugh.

Might save the welfare rolls a lot of money in the long term.

(you really wanna "mess" with a cop's mind? Treat them with real respect. Yes, Sir, yes, Maaam, etc. Throws the hardasses for a loop, when they're expecting typical San Francisco liberal backtalk. Like judo!)

Guy in the top right picture looks like he is dancing.

Phugedaboudet could not have said it better myself.

It is funny because yesterday afternoon I was thinking about how a few yobs on the back top deck wearing hoodies etc and the bus stopped at a cordon in London and then the bus drive reported some suspicious people to the SWAT. Everbody ws taken of the bus and the SWAT stormed it, yelling and shouting. Imagine what a shock the yobs must have got.

Sky News said that person was later released and had nothing to do with it.

Have you got a link to the article?

[edit on 22/7/05 by GodAtum]