It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pavil
reply to post by Arawn
Actually I think David Copperfields "flying" illusion is even better than the Criss Angel's "high Levitations". The passing through the twirling sets of rings is very impressive. Criss Angel does nothing on that scale in regards to going through objects while levitating.
Eyewitness and Paul Richards, please explain how David does this trick with props. You have previously stated that DC does not have the gift and therefore it must be an illusion. I am curious to how you think he does it.
Originally posted by kickass
And Paul Richard...
Actually, Paul has respect from my side (and I flagged him as one of my friends, although I really disagree with his views in this thread!) and manages to answer in an intelligent way most of the time.
Originally posted by kickass
He seems to have some insight in stuff that I find really interesting which may - or may not - explains his views on this thread.
Originally posted by kickass
Paul: What I dont understand is how a guy like you, that describes yourself as
"I have many years of experience in spiritual and metaphysical counseling.
* I have a history degree, graduated with high honors.
* Became a certified hypnotherapist in 1994... "
even wants to be remotely associated with Eyewitness...that really eludes me and IMHO drags you down to his low level.
Originally posted by pavil
reply to post by Badge01
I have to second that. If not for eyewitness86 continued tirades and lack of proof I would have been content to never research CA that much. It's not like I was a CA debunker beforehand and came to prove him for what he is, I just wanted to disprove eyewitness and his logic on this topic. I still enjoy CA but seeing his stunts, tricks and illusions now have taken away much of the "wow" factor. I bet the Cirque show will rock though. All good Illusionists and magicians still amaze me.
Originally posted by pavil
reply to post by Badge01
I have to second that. If not for eyewitness86 continued tirades and lack of proof I would have been content to never research CA that much. It's not like I was a CA debunker beforehand and came to prove him for what he is, I just wanted to disprove eyewitness and his logic on this topic. I still enjoy CA but seeing his stunts, tricks and illusions now have taken away much of the "wow" factor. I bet the Cirque show will rock though. All good Illusionists and magicians still amaze me.
Originally posted by kickassFor those of you that enjoy Monthy Pyton you may remember the Black Knight sketch below...just insert Eyewitness as the Black Knight and you will quite clearly see what this reminds you of...
[edit on 17-9-2007 by kickass]
Originally posted by eyewitness86
Before I ask one more simple question, here is my reply to the personal attacks against me: They illustrate clearly the depth to which some people will go to avoid simple questions . It is quite apparent that since not one of you can actually give us anything more than totally unsupported assertions you must resort to slander and innuendo and lies to veer the attention away from your empty position. The more aware and intelligent people reading this will see the obvious and those already mired in Denial will never see it, so you have been a most effective demonstration of the utter lack that is the basis of your beliefs.
Please explin to us how Criss Angel manages to make a living, in Las Vegas, with a LIVE show, if he has to pay his witnesses and tricks all the film? He makes the majority of his money from LIVE appearances at the hotel(s) there and has for several years. That is his main source of income. He does NOT get one penny from us watching him on Youtube, and he makes little from TV revenue, which is based on advertisers perceptions of the buying power and likilhood of purchasing their particular products from that age group, financial status, etc. It is fair to say that Criss makes a decent amount from TV, but if it were a pot of gold, he would never work so many nights and do as many performances as he does.
Since the main source of his income is from live shows, he obviously cannot pay people to attend them!! They pay HIM, and they pay him to perform ILLUSIONS, " Body/Mind?Spirit demonstrations " as he calls them( such as levitation and teleportation, etc ) right in front of them, close up.
So, people pay him, and not the reverse. Not ONE person has ever alleged such payment, that HAS to mean something, even to a denier. NOT ONE person attending a LIVE Criss show has EVER seen the ' wires ' and ' props ' that are supposed to be removed from the video, as you allege. How can he fool the paying customer if he is using props and paying off witnesses to be silent forever? Tell us that please.
Here is your chance. Give it your all. Tell us the answer to this one simple question:
How does Criss Angel manage to make money, big money, and remain on the very top of his profession, if his live audiences cannot see many of the same feats, up close, personal, and with every opportunity to see any props, wires, etc. that could be used to duplicate the feats seen on video?
But don't bother with all those questions I asked , just stick to the one big one: How does he make money if you are correct about him? I cannot wait to hear the sincere, intelligent, LIKELY ways that it can be so.
Originally posted by eyewitness86
He does NOT get one penny from us watching him on Youtube, and he makes little from TV revenue, which is based on advertisers perceptions of the buying power and likilhood of purchasing their particular products from that age group, financial status, etc. It is fair to say that Criss makes a decent amount from TV, but if it were a pot of gold, he would never work so many nights and do as many performances as he does.
A&E has once again landed in among the top five ad supported networks on cable, ending the first quarter of 2007 by posting double-digit gains over the same time period last year among key demographics. Versus the first quarter of 2006, A&E garnered increases of 40 percent among adults 25-54, 41 percent among adults 18-49, 44 percent among adults 18-34 and 44 percent in household rating. These increases represent the best quarterly averages in network history in adults 25-54 (731,000), 18-49 (717,000) and 18-34 (323,000).
Versus all ad-supported networks, A&E ranked fourth in adults 25-54 and fifth in adults 18-49. This marks the network’s best competitive quarterly performance ever in those demos.
VALUE TO ADVERTISERS
1. Eight (8) quarters of consecutive growth among Adults 18-49.
2. Dramatically improved younger demo impressions with the launch of successful original series.
3. A&E has an extremely visible programming profile among viewers, critics and trade press, and received the most Emmy nominations for any basic cable network in the history of the Emmy.
4. High net worth – Average viewers assets reaching over $1 million.
A&E’s viewers are....Getting Younger!
Prime Average Median Age 47
Down 14 years from August 2003-August 2005.
Daypart A25-54 VPVH
Mon-Fri 8a – 8p 503
Mon-Sun 8p – 11p 632
Sat-Sun 7a – 8p 615