Originally posted by fooffstarr
Paul Richard, i'm going to give up.
You are like talking to a brick wall, you don't even attempt to listen to anyone else's opinions. You are so sure that your view is correct that you
won't even take the time to discuss more acceptable options.
I'm sorry, but that does not constitute a cogent argument. Perhaps then you should give up.
Originally posted by fooffstarr
Just because you can't understand something doesn't mean 'magick' is the conclusion.
Please provide us with a video upload or video link which explains how Criss Angel can levitate many feet in the air when surrounded by many
eyewitnesses who attest that there were no wires, strings, or aircraft that helped him pull it off.
You have no explanations. The only thing you have to offer is: "magick doesn't exist." That is not an explanation; that is just a belief
system.
Magick exists as well as Gifts of Telekinesis. If you study the soft styles of martial arts and also various healing modalities, you will know this
experientially. If you are bias in your thinking, you will never come to know that it exists and will never do the research to confirm it for
yourself
Western science cannot explain an energy system that cannot be measured in a laboratory or duplicated in any way, except with another person who has a
Gift. And there are many of those, e.g., Sai Baba, Uri Geller, Matthew Manning, and the one that this thread is about. Geller and Manning were tested
decades ago under strict laboratory conditions and both were found to have a genuine Gift of Telekinesis. Go to Uri Geller's site for more info on
that.
So it isn't like there isn't evidence out there or that those who understand Criss Angel to have a Gift of Telekinesis are simply believing it out
of blind faith.
Many reference sites have been provided by various individuals in this thread that point to someone having a Gift of Telekinesis now, as well as
explaining those who are documented in having had one historically.
The only blind faith going on in here is among those who refuse to embrace the
evidence presented.
We are still waiting for video uploads or video links that explain how Criss Angel levitates high in the air. Beyond two or three feet of levitation,
the Balducci illusion simply doesn't wash.
Originally posted by fooffstarr
If we knew how they did every trick there would be no fun in it would there?
That is neither here nor there, and is therefore irrelevant.
The argument that many have used in this and related threads is that "all the so-called feats of telekinesis can be explained away as tricks and
there are sites that show how they are done."
But in fact, there are not sites that explain all of the feats of David Blaine and especially Criss Angel. Oh sure, some of the lesser, rather
insignificant sleight-of-hand and misdirection illusions are addressed, but the feats that really stand out are not touched. The argument used is that
since the simple illusions are explained then obviously the more complex and impressive feats must be illusions as well. That is not a logical
conclusion when addressing someone who has been filmed to levitate between two buildings, to do so in the largest hotel atrium in the world, and also
to do so 500 feet in the air.
And going back to a point that I have made which you and others keep ignoring:
Criss Angel himself has said publicly on a number of occasions, as
in the Fox News interview, that a lot of what he does is REAL.
Originally posted by fooffstarr
You keep asserting that you know this as fact, and yet all you have is an idea, it isn't even a theory as it has no basis. There is an explanation
for every trick they do, and just because you don't have it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Magick exists. It occurs every day all over the world through many people.
Ever hear of Reiki? Or John of God?
You may believe anything you wish. But there is a plethora of evidence that point to both David Blaine and Criss Angel (to a larger extent), in
addition to being illusionists, also having a Gift of Telekinesis
DENY IGNORANCE.
Thank you.
[edit on 7-6-2007 by Paul_Richard]