It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Now they're pushing hard for "speech crime" legislation, so that people
can be punished whether they do anything or not. The general rationale
they use is that as our society becomes more and more "diverse" and
multicultural, we all have to be more careful what we say or write, lest
we offend someone. If we offend someone there may be a public
disturbance, perhaps even a riot. If we want our society to be peaceful
and prosperous, then we all should be careful what we say; we all should
be careful not to say something that may offend a homosexual or a
feminist or a Jew or a Black or what have you. The real threats to a
peaceful, prosperous society, they would have us believe, are the
dissidents, the people who insist on expressing Politically Incorrect
ideas or exposing Politically Inconvenient facts, the people who
deliberately offend other people. They're as bad as terrorists. We need
laws to protect society from them. We need "speech crime" laws, they
One thing they are doing is pushing for what they call "hate
filters" to be installed on the computers used by students in public
schools and by library patrons in public libraries. These "hate filters"
are pieces of software that block access to all Web sites that are
deemed Politically Incorrect. When such a piece of software has been
installed on a computer, then the person using that computer cannot go
to the National Alliance Web site and listen to one of my American
Dissident Voices broadcasts or read the text of the broadcast. He can
access only Politically Correct Web sites from the computer. And of
course, it is the Anti-Defamation League that decides what is
Politically Correct and what is not.
The Anti-Defamation League has been having a frightening degree of
success in persuading librarians and school administrators all over the
country to lobotomize their computers with these Jewish "hate filters."
"It's to protect the children from being exposed to hate," the
Anti-Defamation League claims. And of course, they get the politicians
to back them up. What politician will dare to be against protecting
children from hate? In fact, considering the terminal state of
corruption of politics in America today, what politician will dare to
stand up to the Anti-Defamation League on anything?