It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CAConrad0825
I do not understand what position you are taking inter...the Koran is a book of peace.
Originally posted by CAConrad0825The moderates are those which can live together peacefully and show the respect for each other that all religions asks of us.
Anjem Choudary, the British leader of the militant Islamist group al-Muhajiroun, said that Muslim leaders should not meet Mr Blair for talks while Muslims were being "murdered" in Iraq.
Originally posted by the_oleneo
Originally posted by CAConrad0825
I do not understand what position you are taking inter...the Koran is a book of peace.
That is inaccurate. The Qu'ran is a book compiled from various sayings, guidances and teachings according to those who knew the prophet Mohammed. It is not a book of peace or meant to preach peace but it is a long guidance to ancient laws and teachings of the Arabic interpretation of the Abrahamic laws. Mohammed never wrote the Qu'ran or even instructed anyone to write one, it was made long after Mohammed's death.
Muslims tried to pass off the Qu'ran as the book of peace but how it can be a book of peace when such suggestions like Jews and Christians are infidels and are to be killed and so on?
Originally posted by CAConrad0825The moderates are those which can live together peacefully and show the respect for each other that all religions asks of us.
Every religion has its extreme side. It is all depends on how dedicated and serious the faithful is with their religion, as if they believe its faith is superior over other religions. It's all about competition.
Originally posted by Intelearthling
The Muslim community will not be satisfied until every last Christian and Jew is eradicated from the planet.
Everything is everyone elses fault for their backward thinking.
One day they'll wish they'd never heard of the Koran or Muhammed.
Originally posted by subz
Well ostensibly, Afghanistan and Iraq were primarily invaded because they were Islamic countries that harboured Islamic terrorists. Therefore because muslims were in the majority and their government were muslims they were held responsible for the Islamic terrorists in their midst.
There was obviously Islamic terrorists in Germany and Britain yet you dont see us getting invaded do you?
And in these invasions thousands of innocent muslims are being killed (collateral damage - the most heinous euphemism known to man) merely because they live in an Islamic country.
Originally posted by Astronomer68
Afganistan was invaded because the govt. refused to round up and punish or handover the responsible terrorist parties.
Originally posted by Astronomer68
The fact the govt. was Islamic had nothing to do with it.
Originally posted by Astronomer68
Germany & Britain were and still are trying to do something about terrorists while the two countries above were not. Further, Pakistan also is a breeding ground for terrorists and we didn't invade them either because they agreed to do something about it and are doing so.
Originally posted by Astronomer68
I normally see your logic Subz, but this time it totally escapes me.
Originally posted by subz
Yeah it did, both governments (Taliban & Hussein) were painted as backward afronts to our Western sensibilities.
Ignoring the fact that they have nukes for a moment, would we be so willing to invade a "white christian" nation EVEN IF they were indignant and unwilling to hand over "terrorists"? Some might, lots wouldnt.
Originally posted by Astronomer68
The U.S. government seems to try to demonize every person or group or country they dislike or intend to fight. So, to the extent that the govt. unintentionally, or not, demonized muslims along with the terrorists and Saddam Hussein & sons--even though they made a great show of showing solidarity with & tolerance for Muslims--I'll concede to your view on this point.
Originally posted by Astronomer68
Given the mood of the country right after the 9/11 attacks, yeah, I think we probably would have. We are not a "turn the other cheek" nation and being young, tend to react rather emotionally many times.
Originally posted by Astronomer68
If I came on a little strong Subz, I apologize. I respect your opinions and highly value the postings you make.
Originally posted by CAConrad0825
I beg to differ...if you read the quran, you will understand that Mohammad wished only for peace, and if anything Christianity and Western Civilization have done more wrong to Islam than they have to us. If we stopped meddling in their business and let them run their countries their way, things would be a lot different. I am not condoning terror. However our actions led them to it. Two wrongs do not make a right but the first action still is wrong.