Originally posted by warthog911
This post is for two people viz stealth spy and chinawhite.These 2 users fight everyday that who is the better country.Although China backstabbed
India in 1962 but it would be totally life threatining for india to ally with bush who is a puppet for the illuminati and wants a fascist
NWO.
Since there is no NWO nor Illuminati then there should be nothin restricting india from closely allying with the United States.
Remember stealth spy that China and Russia supports India's entry for permanent U.N membership while U.S supports Japan.So U.S fails to
recognise 1 billion+ people and recongnises some 20-60 million people.
When did the US
reject a spot for india? Japan is a very close ally of the US, so why
shouldn't the US make a bid for it, especially
if india already has russia and china supporting it? Not to mention that the socialists are in power in india now anyway, nor that they're a nation
that's engaging in a nuclear arms race with a neighbhor that its fought more than one war with recently???
Times have changed,the U.S we once knew is finished.Bush and his minions want WW3,WANT NWO.India should ally with China rather then U.S.I know any
americans would feel that this is propaganda but Americans should wake up and realise that their govt has been covertly hijacked by these
globalist
It would be fallacy to pretend that only the US is involved in Globalism. UN Security Council seats and international agreements btween china india
and russia
are globalism.
And stealth spy and china white you should stop your hatred .
Remeber that Russia+China+India can really defeat the NWO.
There is no NWO
All is required is that China to be a democracy.
Since china is ruled under a communist one part dictatorship that has absolute control of the military and wealth, that doesn't look likely, to say
the least.
betaiso
I think India is threading on thin ice to embrace America rather than staying with the long time friend and ally, the Russian.
Russia isn't their traditional ally, the Soviety Union was. The Soviets were involved with India to advance socialism and communism, whereas the US
had icy relations with india because of their socialism and communism. Now that its obvious that india isn't going to go outright communist, and
that even communist china is engaging in globalism and a market economy, the US can afford to have closer relations with india. Also, look at where
the economies are and the peoples are. The money and population is circling between india and the US, with service industries and technology
companies outsourcing and basing in india and indians moving from asia into the United States, not russia, not china.
the US is trying to steal friend from the Russian, this is to break up the Russian-India-China triangle that centered on the Russia
That too would be a reasonable tactic and probably does have something to do with it all. But one cannot ignore the movement of capital and
people.
they didn't see that US won't think for another second to slap sanction on any country on this planet that contradicting their, US,
"national interest".
What countries has the US placed international sanctions on for 'disgreeing' with them?
During the cold war the internationalist communist
revolution was fought with a policy of contaiment, but it would be facile to say that that was merely an ideological disagreement.
nordix
So as we see, there’s no need to talk about America in this case, they’re already moving to the right direction.
Based on being given 'observer' status in a globalist economic multi-lateral organization???? There are no sides in globalism, its all about
participiating in a global economy and global development. Economy nad Developement
requires the heavy involvement of the United States. Any
more 'torwards' russia by entering into a globalist organization ultimately only brings india closer to the US, since in the end the organization is
about broading economic ties between all countries. Its a 'russia centered' organization in a system that the US has had nearly a 60 year head
start on.