It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You probably won't hear this anywhere in the mainstream media, so I might as well do it. I hate to beat this Rove thing to death with a stick, but, I'm seeing all these reporters at White House Press Briefings, and in the papers, and on TV all hinting—without actually saying it, but strongly implying—that Karl Rove is guilty. But what you may not know is that the legal position of the organizations they work for is that Karl Rove has committed no crime. In fact, their position is that no crime has been committed at all, in reference to the Valerie Plame case.
And what, exactly, is their legal position?
There is ample evidence on the public record to cast considerable doubt that a crime has been committed...
Congress intended only to criminalize only disclosures that "clearly represent a conscious and pernicious effort to identify and expose agents with the intent to impair or impede the foreign intelligence activities of the United States..."
WASHINGTON — The alleged crime at the heart of a controversy that has consumed official Washington — the "outing" of a CIA officer — may not have been a crime at all under federal law, little-noticed details in a book by the agent's husband suggest.
Originally posted by Valhall
Bout Time - you silly wabbit
EO's aren't for admin, they're for us!
WMDs only threaten us when we're told they do...
EO 12958 only has power when they so!
Originally posted by Seekerof
Media Admits Rove is Innocent
An Orange Jumpsuit for Karl Rove?
Can't get Rove so now its move onto "let's get Bush for not adhering to an EO..."