It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by skippytjc
Soul, you deny that Muslims have had extremists among them before the USA existed? Are you for real?
Originally posted by skippytjc
Soul, you deny that Muslims have had extremists among them before the USA existed? Are you for real?
The USA did not create extreme Muslims, they were around long before the USA was.
Originally posted by geek101
skippy....you advised me to do something as a muslim....i asked you, how do you suggest i go about it.
Could you please answer me. When you suggest something to someone and they ask you how to do it, one would expect you to have the answer, seeing as it was you who suggested it in the first place.
So?....how can i reign in the extremists?
Originally posted by skippytjc
You guys forget about the entire Cold War.
Mutual Annihilation was a situation that kept each enemy in check. Basically the wrong move would mean your destruction as well as your enemies. As terrible as this sounds, it worked for the USA and Russia beautifully. The Cold War is over and we are all still here.
Threatening Mecca with a nuclear attack if we are the subject of a nuclear attack is the same exact tactic. It FORCES each side to think about the consequences of their actions, hopefully to the point of alternate choice making.
Since radical Islam has no single country of origin, a target of grave significance must be chosen. Mecca is the only choice.
You haters are missing the entire point to all of this. Not one American wants to bomb Mecca or open that can of worms. But not one American will tolerate a nuclear attack on our people. But you guys hate Americans to the point where you could care less if we get attacked, you only care of we retaliate.
You also fail to see who needs to take the responsibility for Islamic terrorists and Islamic extremists: Islam does. Muslims need to police their own. Any group that has perpetrated a terrorist attack in the name of Allah needs to be policed by the entire Muslim community. Muslims need to bring them to justice and make it stop, not the West. But, as I mentioned in another reply, only Pakistan has done anything.
It seems the ONLY way to FORCE Islam to manage thier own, is to threaten what they hold dearest. Because its perfectly clear that Islam cares nothing for us, as they as a whole have done nothing to stop Islamic Extremism.
Muslims are responsible for the actions of their own, just like every other group in the world. Until they realize this and take action, bombing Mecca IF the USA is attacked is just fine with me. Id like to press the button if they let me…
We under attack from Islam and if a nuke goes off in New York or Chicago or L.A., it will be Islam that did it
Originally posted by skippytjc
Extreme Muslims give YOU a bad name. They are your responsibility. I ask YOU a question:
What have YOU DONE to stop extremism among your faith? Why is it my responsibility as a non Muslim to keep the extremists among you from killing me?
You want to know what I think you should do? I have no idea. But if Muslims continue to leave that choice up to NON Muslims, we will continue to make choices in OUR best interests.
Its funny, you critisize what the West is doing to defend itself from a sect of your religion, but Muslims as a whole have yet to offer a solution or act themselves.
Terrorist Muslims can only be stopped by non terrorist Muslims. Period. Otherwise nations like my own, the USA, will defend itself however it see's fit. If that doesnt sit well with you, stop posting on these boards and get off your a$$ and do something about it.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
I think it's amazing how in this brave new world of political correctness you can be called a racist for wanting to retaliate against a devestating attack on your country.
We under attack from Islam and if a nuke goes off in New York or Chicago or L.A., it will be Islam that did it. There's no reason not to attack at the center of Islam in retaliation if that happened -- in fact the government would be betraying its own citizens if it didn't do it.
Originally posted by geek101
"Islam" cant "do" anything. ISlam is a religion, a word denoting a group of people.
"people" on the other hand, CAN do something.
Please stop blaming a billion people for the actions of a few.
Originally posted by geek101
how are they my responsibility? They are not my children. I dont know them, i have no association with them.
You suggested something and now you are telling me you dont know how i should go about doing it!
Hmmm
You have voted paperclip for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have two more votes this month.
Are you really that naive to think that you could stop radicals from attacking people by threatening to bomb Mecca?
I mean, come on. This is not some crappy Hollywood movie, this is reality. In reality these radicals thrive on ideas like that one. They don't care about holy places; they care about limiting political influence of secularism in their countries. They USE religion as a tool to control people, so nuking holy site would be very much welcomed by them as a PERFECT way to get more Muslims on their side.
It would also be a perfect thing to DIVIDE western world, since most sane people in the west wouldn't support such action. It would create an even further destabilization of the world, exactly the thing extremists are trying to achieve.
You have voted kenshiro2012 for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have used all of your votes for this month.
Originally posted by geek101
how are they my responsibility? They are not my children. I dont know them, i have no association with them.
You suggested something and now you are telling me you dont know how i should go about doing it!
Hmmm
Originally posted by skippytjc
Now were talking! about time somebody on the hill grew some nuggets.
CNN
"DENVER, Colorado (AP) -- A Colorado congressman told a radio show host that the U.S. could "take out" Islamic holy sites if Muslim fundamentalist terrorists attacked the country with nuclear weapons.
Rep. Tom Tancredo made his remarks Friday on WFLA-AM in Orlando, Florida. His spokesman stressed he was only speaking hypothetically.
Talk show host Pat Campbell asked the Littleton Republican how the country should respond if terrorists struck several U.S. cities with nuclear weapons.
"Well, what if you said something like -- if this happens in the United States, and we determine that it is the result of extremist, fundamentalist Muslims, you know, you could take out their holy sites," Tancredo answered.
"You're talking about bombing Mecca," Campbell said.
"Yeah," Tancredo responded."
I, for one, am 100% behind this if any radical Islamic group used a WMD on US soil.
Why? Because we need main streem MUSLIM help keeping that from happening. If the entire Muslim community believed that this would be the response from the USA if a Islamic group used a nuke, then they themselves would do everything they could to keep the radicals among them in check. Hey, islamic law states: And eye for an eye...
[edit on 18-7-2005 by skippytjc]