well if chupacabra is fake then i guess aliens are fake..if aliens are fake then i guess bigfoots fake...if he's fake then i guess nessie is
fake.....if u think that thats fine but where is the evidence...anybody can say somethign like that and just say "because"...if there was some proof
i would like to c it....but ur kinda at a disadventouge cause it is kinda hard to disprove something that happens all the time....maybe u should think
b4 u type
The point was to make people laugh... it worked... maybe you should watch your mouth.
You can't just link them all together in one big if-then statement. You CAN however put them all in one category of "probably not real" stuff...
but your logic is severely failing.
I think a better explanation would be my reply to:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Most people on earth are in a state of mind where they assume them all to be fake. While they have doubts at times about some of them, the general
populouus assumes them not to be true.
Here you go:
Vampires:
I've never seen an account or a vampirism case where it is not obvious, or fairly certain that the perp was just some guy (a normal human) who likes
to drink blood. If you want to consider those people Vampires, then ok... they're real. But Vampires in a sense of living-dead, suprenatural, or
demonic... have not been documented to my knowledge. There's a lot of sick people out there, you've got to diferentiate between them and a living
dead supernatural blood sucker.
Dragons:
A lot of people will try to convince the world that just because both the English (and europe) and the Chineese believe in Dragons, that they are
real. The reason they use is that since neither culture really had contact with the other when the belief/suspicion of dragons arose, that they must
have some truth to them. The fact is that English Dragons and Chineese Dragons are NOTHING alike except they are reptilian in appearance. Just look at
the physical diferences... they look hardly anything like eachother. Not only that but the English believed dragons were creatures to be feared,
though they supposedly posessed high inteligence, they were supposedly 'evil'. Chineese dragons were supposedly supernatural entities, not truely
physical in nature. I'm not sure if they were all 'good' dragons, but I believe most (if not all) of them were. They brought luck, prosparity,
etc... The chineese also believed dragons to be highly inteligent. ALSO, I've never seen a skeleton or any other evidence of a dragon. Unless dragons
blow up when they die, there should be some physical remains of a dragon (at least a western dragon) somewhere. The best we've got are dinosaurs...
but they were extinct WAY before the time of the English.
Reptoids:
Uh huh... alien lizards... you can't tell me that doesn't sound like a suspicion brought up years ago by 3rd rate 60's sci-fi movies. I'll believe
in greys, but reptoids are really far fetched in my opinion. I can see a reason for an inteligent humanoid, but an inteligent lizard is a little
rediculous.
Chupacabra:
Physical evidence including the remains of one were found. They've left a wake of farm-animal destruction all across Clile and Puerto Rico (and some
parts of the US and even Europe have similar accounts). Hundreds of animal coarpses have been found with the same method of demise, including some
sightings where the Chupacabra was SEEN attacking an animal.
Out of ALL of these, the Chupacabra is the only one where any significant evidence has been produced to account for the creature's existance. THAT is
my reason for saying that.
[Edited on 22-8-2003 by Greyhaven]