It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The lies of Ex-Iraqi Captive Douglas Wood

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 18 2005 @ 12:52 AM
link   
Remember Jessica Lynch and the made up story of her dramatic rescue?
Well Australian hostage Douglas Wood who was recently returned to Australia and since been praising the efforts of the US and Australian governments has a few skeltons in his closet also....Seems he's not all he claimed to be and his story isn't the truth either.

[NOTE: It's quiet a long article so although this seems like a large quote, it's only a fraction of the link. The Age requires subscription so some articles can only be viewed ONCE before they ask you to login. Might be worth copying the entire article if you want to reference it or read it later]



On the trail of Doug Wood

John Watkinson remembers the day when his business partnership with Douglas Wood turned ugly. Driving down to the Dead Sea on holiday in Jordan in April 2004, he received a distressed phone call from his assistant in Baghdad.

She said Wood was mishandling a large payment of money they had received for a construction contract for a building they were refurbishing in the US-administered Baghdad safe haven otherwise known as the Green Zone
Watkinson alleges Wood absconded with $US50,000 of the company's money and fled Baghdad in a taxi to Georgia, via Turkey.

Watkinson, who severed his business relationship with Wood 14 months ago, strongly disputes many of Wood's claims of business success in Iraq, claiming Wood had been kicked off projects and sidelined from others after offering a financial inducement to secure a construction contract. He regards claims by Wood that he was about to secure an oil- related contract on the day he was taken hostage as highly fanciful. "And how does anyone get into an oil deal? The Iraqis have been trading oil for years - why would they need Doug?"

Watkinson says Wood was nearly destitute and living in a derelict building when he was kidnapped in controversial circumstances. An Iraqi businessman, who declined to be identified and who has closely studied many hostage snatches for his own protection, says that kidnappings are usually highly organised, target people with connections who will attract a lot of attention and are often carried out in broad daylight. Wood was taken in a prearranged meeting at a private house.

Watkinson is also puzzled by the circumstances of the kidnapping, believing Wood may have been an easy target because he was living in the highly dangerous Red Zone, but added that he was of no commercial value because of his parlous financial position.

Interviewed by Federal Police and Australian officials after Wood disappeared on 29 April, Watkinson says police told him they believed Wood got himself into trouble and if he had been more careful would never have been taken hostage. "I had a feeling that the Australian Federal Police were just as puzzled as I was about the nature and circumstances of the kidnapping," he says.

After a far-reaching investigation into Wood's business activities in Baghdad and London, and into the circumstances surrounding his disappearance and astonishingly coincidental discovery by Iraqi troops on the day he was due to be released, The Sunday Age can reveal for the first time:

- Wood's company International Projekts Management Limited, registered with US authorities in Iraq for contract work, has not filed a financial return with British regulators because it has never made any money. The company has been dormant since 1996 when it was first registered. It has paid-up share capital of ££1000 (A$2336).

- Despite claims that he made money in Georgia, Watkinson and friends of Wood say he arrived in Baghdad broke after claiming he had $5000 stolen from his luggage on his flight from the former Soviet republic. Inquiries reveal that he owed money not only to his former employees Faris Shakir and Adel Najm (taken hostage with Wood but executed before he was picked up by Iraqi soldiers on 15 June), but also to hotels and other businesses in Baghdad.

- Despite repeated assurances that he would send money to the families of Faris Shakir and Adel Najm, Wood has only compensated the family of Faris with a payment of $US5000. Adel Najm's widow, Moona Jasmin Mohammed, told The Sunday Age Wood had not contacted her even though it is a month since he returned to Australia. Hayder Faris, the son of Faris Shakir, says he is yet to receive an "unspecified sum" Wood promised.

- There is evidence to suggest Wood's kidnappers were not the Shura Council of the Mujahideen as portrayed on the video tapes sent to al-Jazeera television and the Australian Embassy in Baghdad, but members of a criminal gang.

The gang initially wanted $US25 million, but later moderated this to $US100,000. Both Sheikh Taj al-Din al-Hilali, the senior Australian Muslim cleric, and his guide in Iraq, Qusai Abdulaziz, a Sydney businessman, who went to Iraq to negotiate Wood's release, said intermediaries and other sheikhs they contacted in Baghdad while searching for Wood told them the kidnapping was not the work of the Shura Council. "We were told this was an unusual case, that the circumstances were rather extraordinary," said Abdulaziz.

- Sheikh Hilali and Abdulaziz said on May 16 after the intermediaries told them that the gang holding Wood may target them.

- Sheikh Hilali told The Sunday Age he was shown by intermediaries at a secret rendezvous a yet-to-be-released video of Wood being viciously interrogated by his kidnappers, in which Wood made a number of "disturbing" claims about his activities in Iraq. He said he had briefed Nick Warner, the Australian diplomat in charge of the response team, on the contents of the tape and had agreed to keep it confidential.

· Sheikh Hilali also said that the Wood family had asked that all correspondence with them remain confidential, and was legally copyright and not be released to the public. It is believed some of the correspondence referred to the ransom being demanded and how that might be paid to secure Wood's release.

If Wood was ever successful in business there is little evidence of it. A search of Wood's UK-registered company, which is also registered at the US Government's Central Contracting Registry, confirms the company has been listed as a non-trading dormant company for the last five years.

If Wood had been bidding and winning contracts in Iraq as he claims to have done, he has been posing as an active company while registered as inactive. The May 2005 company returns lists no financial dealings for the previous year.

His determination to cash in on his harrowing 47 days as a hostage suggests he needs money. It has been reported Wood was paid in excess of $A400,000 for the Channel Ten interview and is likely to make another $500,000 from a book deal and other spin-offs. He told ABC radio on July 3: "So if I can make a little money sharing some of the pain and agony, then why not? Because I am a kind of victim, I'm not the bloody - I don't feel I am a . . . money grubber. I feel I'm a poor bugger who had a tough time and is now out of work."

www.theage.com.au...




posted on Jul, 18 2005 @ 02:59 AM
link   
May I ask why such scrutiny is not imposed upon the "other side" as well?

In other words, the press apparently will spend days and weeks poring through the background of someone who was captured by a group of murderers but when someone comes forwarding claiming something against the US or its allies, their word is taken as gospel.

Scrutiny is good. It removes waste from society doesn't it? Why not hold the standard for everyone. Not just certain people.

I'd be interested to see a massive full background report on the guys claiming mistreatment in Gitmo. I'd like to know their financial dealings from the past and how trustworthy they are considered, and why their word is considered gold by the press.

Fair is fair, isn't it? If you're going to X-ray Lynch and Wood, keep it an even playing field.



posted on Jul, 18 2005 @ 03:32 AM
link   
I have to disagree, Djarums... The "other side" is more then well (too "well" I might say) presented in mainstream media such as CNN, BBC, etc. In my opinion, sites like ATS, offer the opportunity to people to see what is ignored by the massmedia. In this line of thought - great work ShroudOfMemphis!

Btw, I love those Indonesian cigarettes



posted on Jul, 18 2005 @ 03:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by Djarums
I'd be interested to see a massive full background report on the guys claiming mistreatment in Gitmo. I'd like to know their financial dealings from the past and how trustworthy they are considered, and why their word is considered gold by the press.

Fair is fair, isn't it? If you're going to X-ray Lynch and Wood, keep it an even playing field.


hmmm, kind of different when you go into a situation like this as either a soldier or a business man than to be pulled from a cab and put on a jet to Egypt for conditioning.

Thou yes, an investigation into the people at Gauntanamo should be something that is done. They should have a full investigation into why they are there, who they are and what the interest in them is but that would require them being brought up on charges. At the moment they are just people who the US are 'renditioning' to get information out of.

The fact that Douglas Wood has been called out as a fraud is important because Australia got a gut full of war propaganda in all media and had Politicians going on TV calling the people Terrorists etc etc. They told a grand story of US troops and Iraqi Police rescueing him which was countered by the Iraqi's who were hardly heard at all on commercial TV when saying that the story is bogus.

This is pure propaganda. The media and the Government made a hero and a celebrity out of a liar and a dumbass so they could sell the war in Iraq and the job being done as a good cause in fighting Terrorism. People died for Douglas Wood and his survival and people risked their lives for him and that was mistold so they could turn bad publicity into good publicity.



posted on Jul, 18 2005 @ 03:52 AM
link   
Wag

The

Dog

Doesn't anyone see the resemblance between Wood and Woody? Good old Shoe?

C'mon...

That's good investigative journalism, how could you possibly take issue with that Djarums?

Seems like you're just upset about them not picking another story.

Lemme tell you a story. One time I was driving on I95, over the Goldstar bridge. I was moving with traffic, going about 75-80 miles an hour. A cop pulled me over for speeding. I asked him why he pulled me over when everybody was going the same speed. He replied "I'll get them next time."

Good journalists will report on any good story.

Don't assume all journalists are more anti-Bush than they are pro-truth, because I think you'd be very mistaken.



posted on Jul, 18 2005 @ 10:42 AM
link   

That's good investigative journalism, how could you possibly take issue with that Djarums?

Seems like you're just upset about them not picking another story.


Not sure what you're talking about.

All I've expressed is a desire that all people be given equal treatment by the press. And yes, if it matters, I believe that we should know the indentities of all the detainees at Gitmo, and why they're being held, and what they're being charged with.

Good investigative journalism is great when it's evenhanded and aims for both sides. If some detainees are making claims of a very serious nature against the United States government and we are supposed to want things to be changed to stop that... well why don't we have a right to know who the people are that are making those allegations.

If Wood is a fraud, great!! Investigative journalism settled the issue and his credibility will end up where it belongs, and you know people will take what he says for what it's worth.

Why is asking the same treatment of those who levy charges against the government seen by you as something unfair?

Look into all of them. Not just anti-american, not just pro-american.



posted on Jul, 24 2005 @ 09:35 PM
link   
jessica lynch?
you mean the girl that said that all the stuff the mainstream media said was a fabricated lie to pump up support for the war? you mean the girl that was telling how the popular story PUSHED by the media, was in fact TOTALLY FABRICATED at the same time that a tv movie about her was touting the OFFICIAL LIE?

yeah, fair dinkum, indeed.

the pattern of the lie supporters is getting very obvious.

'don't think about what you just said. let me ask you an un answerable question, instead'. 'forget about the evident crimes of THESE people, what about the crimes of the people before them?' 'it's already been debunked'. 'prove it'.

ignore denial.




top topics



 
0

log in

join