posted on Jul, 18 2005 @ 12:16 AM
Nice find a person could spend days going over this stuff.
Just from a quick view, I've already found something new to look into that I hadn't thought about , i.e. What is this " disk recovery" in La. that
the F.B.I. were denied a cursory examination by Army Air Force Intelligence, and why are the F.B.I. and AAFI calling it a " disk" if " Flying
Disks" aren't real . What could possibly have been recovered in La. that the AAFI and F.B.I. wouldn't be aware of ?
It couldn't have been an ICBM those didn't exist in '47, and it was "recovered " in La. ( Louisiana)
Why would it be mentioned in the context of " Flying Disks" documents in July of '47?
[edit on 18-7-2005 by lost_shaman]