It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Evidence for offical explanation of 7/7 thread

page: 1

log in


posted on Jul, 17 2005 @ 12:23 PM
Right, I thought it would be a good idea to have one point of reference for information that backs up offical claims and lines of inquiry.

1) Photo of terrorists, together at Luton station on morning of attack:

(Just bad luck they split up and ended up in the wrong places at wrong time?)

2) Kingstar Van

Kingstar carry out controlled demolitions using non-explosive means it implies this on their website: and in the Yahoo directory.

Kingstar provides concrete and stone structure demolition using diamond drilling, concrete bursting and crunching, wall and floor sawing.

3) Excercise

People have been saying that the terrorists thought they wre part of the excercise, etc. When you look at what was said and what the company does, you can see that they would not have had people pretending to be terrorists. I've already started a thread on that here:

[edit on 17-7-2005 by AgentSmith]

new topics

log in