PLAYING INTO BIN LADEN'S HANDS, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 21-8-2003 @ 01:50 AM by Estragon
"The economy is on its way back up... international investment at an all time high (11 bil i believe), gdp growth of 2.5% last Q, euro to the dollar DOWN 1.2 to 1.1 in the past 6 months"
This would be the America between Canada and Mexico? - a 20-year high in unused manufacturing capacity! Is foreign investment necessarily good: it means they own you and you owe them and they'll run if the dollar gets weaker. At present the decline of the dollar leads foreigners to spot good bargains; but the uS is selling cheap and foreign investors can hardly be expected to show loyalty to anything other than their own, foreign, shareholders.
Such good news as there is does not include unemployment: people care a lot more about that than shadowy performance indicators.
The Bank for International Settlements has expresed its great concern over the dollar.
A weakening dollar helps little because many competitors (China is the obvious one) link their currencies to the dollar so if the dollar gets cheaper -Chinese goods get cheaper: mor eimports and even less attractive exports.
On Monday the dollar was at a four-year low against the Euro and only 3 cents off the all-time low of 1.18 which was when the Euro was first launched back in 1999.
This is what the Fed itself says in the Beige Book:
www.federalreserve.gov...
"Reports...signs...economic activity increased a notch during June and the first half of July. Chicago, St. Louis, and San Francisco..economic activity..sluggish...Atlanta.... the remaining districts suggested somewhat stronger growth....generally more positive assessments of current economic activity, several districts....increased optimism...prospects in coming months."

If's, maybe's:"sluggish", "somewhat", "suggests", "prospects": there's no very great economic miracle here.



reply posted on 21-8-2003 @ 10:36 PM by dragonrider
Originally posted by Fester
Well if you think that going to court with some of the most powerful people in the world is wise and that you would actually have a fair trial then why not do it?

Seriously sir, you would only end up dead trying something so dense. Get real. Libel is not something that you are worth dying for is it? You may be think that the truth is worth dying for. I doubt that it isn't. Yet will the truth be revealed before one was killed. Or better yet, would anyone even believe you?

Yeah maybe a few of us and the few others in America and around the world. But will the media advertize you the support you get? Will the common proud American support your beliefs?

That is the question you must ask.

So Dragonrider, what makes you think that Usama Bin Laden is in bed with our administrative or military elites?



There is something SOOOOOO familiar about this....

*cough* FM *cough*

OK, I'll play along...

First of all, you have to define exactly who is accusing me of libel. The US government? Did I specify the US government in total? OK, maybe the CIA, as they are the ones I tend to suspect in such matters.

When was the last time the CIA showed up in court? On a libel case?

Are they likely to make me disappear because I level such charges at them? Well now, wouldnt that be a virtual admission of guilt to make a loud public voice disappear after making such allegations? (Please be real, doing so would only make more questions be asked...)

So assume that we do end up in court (even if the CIA lead attourney were reading this thread, he/she would likely be shaking his head...) As I said, the burden of proof lies with the accuser... and to prove me (or anyone else) wrong, that would mean dragging information that they would prefer to leave hidden out into the public light. Would they even show up in court? That would bring far too much public attention on the situation.

But, to your point about proving my point:

Network dates back to Afghan war
Bin Laden began forming his network in 1979, when he went to Afghanistan to fight the Soviets alongside Afghan resistance fighters known as the mujahedeen.

He used his family's connections and wealth to raise money for the Afghan resistance and provide the mujahedeen with logistical and humanitarian aid, and participated in several battles in the Afghan war.

As the war with the Soviets drew to a close, bin Laden formed al Qaeda, an organization of ex-mujahedeen and other supporters channeling fighters and funds to the Afghan resistance.

Once the Soviets pulled out of Afghanistan, bin Laden returned to Saudi Arabia to work for the family construction firm, the bin Laden Group. He became involved in Saudi groups opposed to the reigning Saudi monarchy, the Fahd family.

www.cnn.com...

(Now, what they are not mentioning is the deep ties between the Mujahedeen and the CIA, but that is never going to be released on CNN!)

And as Afghan rebels fought Soviet invaders in the During the 1980s, the United States gave aid from afar while Saudi exile Osama bin Laden provided support from within Afghanistan. In 1988, with U.S. knowledge, bin Laden created Al-Qaeda (The Base); a conglomerate of quasi-independent Islamic terrorist cells spread across 26 or so countries.

healthandenergy.com...

The Soviets invaded the nation and installed a puppet regime in the capitol of Kabul after anti-Communist forces took control in 1979. A long, weary guerilla war between various Afghan resistance groups and Soviet forces ensued. In 1984, the United States and other nations began supporting the Mujahedeen, and in 1992 the resistance group successfully took over Kabul and declared Afghanistan liberated.

edition.cnn.com...


reply posted on 21-8-2003 @ 10:38 PM by dragonrider
Oh yes, and this one too...

OSAMA BIN LADEN - A CIA CREATION AND ITS "BLOWBACK"

"TERRORIST" IS CONNECTED TO CIA, DRUGS AND WE MAY HAVE DELIBERATELY PROVOKED HIM TO ATTACK

WE MAY NOT WANT TO CATCH HIM EITHER

[Reprinted from the September, 1998 issue of From The Wilderness]

[© 1998, 2001 - From The Wilderness Publications. All Rights Reserved. May Be Reprinted for Non-Profit Purposes Only]

by

Michael C. Ruppert



On August 20 [1998] the United States launched a series of cruise missile attacks against alleged terrorist camps in Afghanistan and a pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum, Sudan, both of which were said to be under the control of a rabid Islamic fundamentalist leader and arch terrorist named Osama bin-Laden. I did some checking on bin-Laden and what I found out leads me to suspect that the CIA and the U.S. government would rather have this evil terrorist hiding in the mountains of Afghanistan than answering questions which might embarrass them.

Shortly after the Russians invaded Afghanistan, the young and wealthy Saudi Arabian named bin-Laden rushed to Afghani mountains to fight a Muslim holy war against Godless Communism. Having inherited more than thirty million dollars from his father's construction business he was in a position to lend immediate help to the struggling Afghani freedom fighters. He formed quick alliances among the half dozen or so major factions of the Mujahedeen led by Afghani Sheik Hekmatyar.

US records indicate that we spent nearly $3 billion dollars over the next eight years to train and equip the Afghan rebels. We even supplied them with Stinger missiles, which caused great concern in later years as we began to fear they would be turned against us. The U.S. Congress appropriated ransom money to buy them back in the early 90s. Few were recovered. In addition the CIA, under Bill Casey, sponsored an explosion in the heroin trade to finance the war. This was nothing new.

In 1979, when the Soviet invasion occurred, virtually none of the heroin entering the US came from the so-called Golden Crescent in Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan. At the time it was coming from Mexico and Southeast Asia. By 1982 the region was producing exportable opium base equivalent to 20-30 tons of heroin a year. Of that, at least 4.5 tons reached the U.S. By 1988 those numbers had increased to 70 to 80 tons of heroin of which 15 to 20 tons reached the US.

64.239.13.64...


*ahem*

You were saying?
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Why my mind is closing towards Capitalism
  Posted 11 days ago with 78 member flags
Hippy Do-Gooders have Destroyed the World
  Posted 12 days ago with 23 member flags
Facts About Socialism
  Posted 3 days ago with 23 member flags
Are Liberals REALLY More Intelligent Than Conservatives?
  Posted 8 days ago with 18 member flags
Why conservatives . . . . . suck!
  Posted 1 days ago with 16 member flags
The "Occupy are Socialists," Megathread
  Posted 12 days ago with 8 member flags
Unpopular Opinions: Say NO to Human Rights
  Posted 6 days ago with 7 member flags
This is what needs to happen: REVOLUTION!
  Posted 14 days ago with 5 member flags