posted on Jul, 16 2005 @ 11:11 AM
That's the hydrodynamic view. The other one is the momentum transfer view, as expressed from Ctech who are making RAMICS.:
""There appear to be two conceptual ways of approaching supercavitation. The generally accepted one derives from propeller cavitation theory and
holds that the water is essentially boiled by dropping its pressure via abrupt acceleration. This creates a source of gaseous water vapor which
creates the cavitation bubble. It is generally assumed that the cavitation bubble is filled with this water vapor. Indeed, in low speed (say
torpedoes) supercavitation applications the cavity size is usually enhanced with ventilation gases. This fits well with the understanding that gas
creates the bubble in the first place and appears to work well within that context. It also fits comfortably in the general framework of marine
Last September, at an ONR sponsored Supercavitation Conference, Dr. Kirschner (of Anteon Corporation) and I were discussing the idea of a theoretical
speed limit for supercavitating objects, assuming material strength issues could be overcome. As previously mentioned, conventional wisdom holds that
the cavity is created by the water vapor and therefore, at some speed, the volumetric rate at which vapor can be generated will become insufficient to
support the formation of a cavitation bubble which will clear the body. In other words, at some velocity the rate at which the water boils will become
insufficient to fill the volume of the "hole" in the water created by the passage of the projectile and the cavity will collapse.
For whatever reason, I have a different mental picture of how the bubble is created, perhaps due to my background in hypersonics in graduate school.
In that field discontinuities and rarified flows are encountered in the course of normal business. I do not know if anyone else shares this view but
Dr. Kirschner and I have discussed it at some length. In any case, I believe the process is fundamentally one of momentum transfer. The cavitator, be
it a disk or cone or whatever, imparts a significant radial velocity (relative to the axis of flight) to the water it comes in contact with. In effect
the water is thrown violently to the side. It therefore has a high radial momentum that is resisted by the pressure of the water around it. This
pressure serves to slow its radial velocity and will bring it to a stop over a finite time. The accepted definition of cavitation number is compatible
with this idea. In the meantime, assuming a circularly symmetric cavitator, a round "hole" has been created in the water. What is in this hole,
other than the projectile? I believe it is a vacuum, at least initially. Of course the water on the interior face of the bubble begins to boil, but it
can only boil so fast, even in a hard vacuum. At slow velocities the rate of boiling can create a fairly decent partial pressure of water vapor in the
cavity. In the limit case, as velocity increases, the pressure inside the cavity in the vicinity of the projectile will go to zero. Eventually the
pressure acting on the water will reverse its radial velocity and cause the cavity to close. However, the projectile will be long gone by that point.
If this approach is correct then, except for finding a material to withstand the steady state stagnation pressure, there may be no hydrodynamic upper
limit to the velocity of a supercavitating body.
In any case, perhaps there is room for both viewpoints. In fact, they may very well be opposite sides of the same theoretical coin."