It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Deep_Purple
I'm feeling fairly safe over here in Northern Ireland at the minute, don't think that any major nuclear superpower would consider us a major risk.
Originally posted by fritz
Infidellic old son, RAF Rudlow Manor is the not on an Ordnance Survey map either and, although it is reputed to be near RAF Boscombe Down, I've never found it. (It's where all the UFO sighting reports are sent!)
RAF Neatishead should not even be in use, or are those nasty Labour defence chiefs lying to us again? Do you know something that we don't? (It was also the centre of an east coast UFO incident in 2003!)
As to the AW & RE establishment at Aldermaston - just down the road from Thatcham, been there and done that.
Originally posted by CrazyOrange
The Falk-Lands are still in UK-control right?
Originally posted by CrazyOrange
Falk-Lands are still in UK-control right?
Originally posted by Infidellic
[ The one where America decided to stay out of it despite the fact that we are your closest allies (sorry if you are not actually American).
In spite of this, President Ronald Reagan and the U.S. administration remained (officially) neutral. (America is suspected of supporting Britain with intelligence, however.)
Shuttle diplomacy and US involvement
Legally, the United States had military treaty obligations to both parties in the war, bound to the UK by NATO and to Argentina by the Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance (the "Rio Pact"). In March, Secretary of State Alexander Haig directed the U.S. Ambassador to Argentina, Nicholas Henderson, to warn the Argentine government away from any invasion. President Ronald Reagan requested assurances from Galtieri against an invasion and offered the services of his Vice President, George H. W. Bush, as mediator, but was refused.
In fact, the Reagan Administration was sharply divided on the issue. Meeting on 5 April, Haig and Assistant Secretary of State for Political Affairs Lawrence Eagleburger favored decisive backing of Britain, concerned that equivocation would undermine the NATO alliance. Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs Thomas Enders, however, feared that supporting Britain would undermine U.S. anti-communist efforts in Latin America. He received the firm backing of U.N. Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick, Haig's nominal subordinate and political rival.
The White House continued its neutrality; Reagan famously declared at the time that he could not understand why two allies were arguing over "That little ice-cold bunch of land down there". But he assented to Haig and Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger's position. Haig briefly (April 8–April 30) headed a "shuttle diplomacy" mission between London and Buenos Aires, but at the end of the month Reagan blamed Argentina for the failure of the mediation, declared U.S. support for Britain, and announced the imposition of economic sanctions against Argentina.
In an infamous episode in June, Kirkpatrick cast a second veto of a U.N. Security Council resolution calling for an immediate cease-fire, then announced minutes later that she had received instructions to abstain. The situation was blamed on a delay in communications, but perceived by many as part of an ongoing power struggle between Haig and Kirkpatrick.
Galtieri likely did not think that the UK would react; otherwise, it is doubtful that Argentina would have launched the attack. Of course, this would have been astounding to British people at the time, already familiar with Margaret Thatcher's controversial uncompromising style of government. In as many words, she declared that the Crown and the Empire had been assaulted, and would not surrender the Falkland Islands to the Argentine jackboot. This stance was aided, at least domestically, by the staunchly conservative British press, especially The Sun, which ran such headlines as 'GOTCHA' (following the sinking of the General Belgrano). The Daily Mirror, on the other hand, vehemently opposed the war, and went so far as to say that reading The Sun would "damage your mind".
A US preoccupation with the Soviet Union and communism and the thought Britain could handle the matter on her own may have factored into this view as well, although assessments of this theory vary. In the broader sense of the Cold War, with the performance of UK forces watched closely by the Soviet Union, it was worthwhile for the UK to handle without assistance a conflict minor in scale compared to an all-out NATO vs. Warsaw Pact war. Regardless, American non-interference was vital to the U.S.-British relationship. Ascension Island, a UK possession, was on lease to the Americans and the British needed to resume its use as a relay point and air base. The main and decisive American contribution was AIM-9 Sidewinder missiles of the latest L model (these missiles were much more deadly than older models of the Sidewinder), spy satellites and intelligence information.
There were also rumours, later expanded upon by Weinberger, which spoke of lending an aircraft carrier, although this was not public knowledge at the time. It is worth noting that both Weinberger and Reagan would go on to receive honorary knighthoods, the honour of Knight Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire, from Queen Elizabeth II. American critics of the U.S. role claimed that, by failing to side with Argentina, the U.S. violated its own Monroe Doctrine (even though an American nation, Argentina, attacked the possession of an existing European power, Britain, that predated the Doctrine).
In September 2001, Mexican president Vicente Fox would cite the conflict as proof of the failure of the Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance.
Originally posted by zero lift
The areas in Black (Red on the colour original) is the Z zone, extremely radioactive areas. Lingering there would have been fatal.
undercoverchef..
Sorry to take this long to get back to you.
Dallas
Originally posted by Infidellic
That place up in scotland -> Home of the RN Nuclear Fleet
Originally posted by jimi
RAF Menwith Hill ( cndyorks.gn.apc.org... ) about 5 miles away from my home town of Harrogate is a prime target for a nuclear attack. The base is home to an American-run radar station that has the capability to intercept communications from anywhere in Europe (or so i've read).
They can capture phone calls, both landline and mobile phone, fax, e-mail and other forms of communication. This information is then sent to the US for examination. I imagine that in the case of a nuclear-based terrorist attack (or a nuclear war involving the US or UK with any country), this place would be pretty high up as a tactical target.
Originally posted by jimi
RAF Menwith Hill ( cndyorks.gn.apc.org... ) about 5 miles away from my home town of Harrogate is a prime target for a nuclear attack. The base is home to an American-run radar station that has the capability to intercept communications from anywhere in Europe (or so i've read).
They can capture phone calls, both landline and mobile phone, fax, e-mail and other forms of communication. This information is then sent to the US for examination. I imagine that in the case of a nuclear-based terrorist attack (or a nuclear war involving the US or UK with any country), this place would be pretty high up as a tactical target.