reply to post by GoldEagle
Having read through your posts I must admit I have not met many persons unhindered by lack of evidence and faulty thinking in doing what they do on
the scale you are doing it.
The analysis of different sides of an argument can give rise to new ideas whereas the exclusive focusing on one side or aspect of a thing will tend to
make you solipsistic, and you are not arguing in earnest that you are Walter B. Yehova, are you?
As much as you may pound your chest, there are pictures of Cydonia clearly showing extensive artificiality. Nasa supplied info as to how they had
degraded the new images into a 'litter box' using inappropriate filters.
All images from Nasa are doctored. I dare you to take the time and thoroughly analyze pictures taken by the Mars rovers. Deep black shadows no matter
how far away from the camera they may be, mismatching shadows, rocks hovering four inches off the ground, all the symptoms of automated obfuscating
targeting orthometrics and symmetries. Automated? This software attacks even the solar panels visible in many images which gave rise to abstruse
theories as to why the panels were so clean after such a long time on an inhospitable planet. The simple answer is that pictures of the solar panels
taken on earth are introduced into the Mars images to cover up the obfuscated solar panels. Sometimes the effect is missed and issued, as seen here :
and for comparison, here is the same solar panel with much darker
color and without the strange lines: origin.mars5.jpl.nasa.gov...
One can see what happened to the straight edge of the panel in the first image, this also serves as a clue what can be concealed using this technique.
You would not recognize a convoy of abandoned fighting vehicles or the remains of small ground-attack fighters sticking out of the ground in a picture
the contrast, saturation, and resolution of which had been fubar'd with gay abandon.
The real question here is: What is the American taxpayer going to do about these facts which I am in no way the only one to see? Shelling out all that
dough just to be lied to is a croocked deal to say the least. It is in no way un-American to demand being told the truth and it would not make you a
terrorist because lying is un-American.
Bringing Phil Plait into the fray doesn't really help. Has he had his eyesight corrected after not being able to tell white from red? Or is it your
ambition to attain similar heights in the lying establishment? There is a difference between debunking something or shouting it down as you obviously
seem to be oblivious of.
This whole tirade is not meant to attack you as a person since I do not know you. It is simply a reaction to how I perceive your posts. If you have
nothing to contribute, get off the pot!