It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by skippytjc
I would be 100% behind any initiative that that played against their beliefs that cause them to cowardly blow up innocent people trying to live their lives. Even if it defaced their system of beliefs.
Originally posted by Boatphone
Originally posted by phoenixhasrisin
I have a question: Of all the people in the thread advocating this "tactic" how many exaclty are actually in Iraq fighting? Or have plans to?
And what does that have to do with us supporting this tatic? Why, are you against it. If used against terrorists who are trying to kill innocent people??
Do I advocate murder with the intention of sending them to hell?
To answer you no but then again, since the islamic extremists (read terrorists) believe that their tactics will send them to heaven while sending their victims to hell, then you now are not only playing a religious game but also a physchological game. If the use or even the rumor of the use of pig's blood were to deter one single attacker from killing (read MURDER) then I will most heartedly support such. I am sorry that your pacifistic outlook on the war blinds you to the facts of the deaths which these murders have imparted on innocents.
just happen to believe this war is not right. You see the difference between me and you is, I am practicing what I preach. I do not believe in the taking of life for thinly veiled imperialistic means therefore I do not. You all on the other hand advocate it, yet do nothing.
As to the second part of your post as for me joining up again and sending terrorists to hell, boy, you do have a very short sight. Let me let you in on a little secret if the above statement did not get your attention, I do not advocate the deaths of anyone but I will and do support the efforts that are being made to stop further murders by these terrorists.
Originally posted by vincere7
Clerics and officers will preach an opposite message offering more incentive to individuals willing to martyr. You don't use tactics based on saying, "oh lets try this!" without first understanding the very enemy you're fighting. It's a dumbass theory coming from hyped up, inexperienced babes.
Originally posted by Byrd
The problem is, the original "letter" is an urban legend!
There is no Islamic justification possible for crimes against humanity, such as the recent London bombings.
The killing of innocents is against basic humanity, and has absolutely no place in the Shariah [Islamic Law]. The Shariah came to preserve five fundamental interests (maqasid): religion, life, intellect, honor, and property. Things that harm any of these are contrary to the very foundations of Divine Law.
God tells us in the Noble Qur’an:
005.032 For that cause We decreed for the Children of Israel that whosoever kills a human for other than manslaughter or corruption in the earth, it shall be as if he had killed all humanity; and who so saves the life of one, it shall be as if he had saved the life of all mankind. Our messengers came unto them of old with clear proofs, but afterwards lo! many of them became prodigals in the earth.
Originally posted by Boatphone
phoenixhasrisin,
Wow. You are so right, there is no such thing as terrorism.
Originally posted by kenshiro2012
By the way, I have spilt my blood in order that you can spout off like this. Have you done the same?
[edit on 13-7-2005 by kenshiro2012]
Originally posted by phoenixhasrisin
I have never needed them nor anyone else to kill anyone for me.
Originally posted by Misfit
Originally posted by phoenixhasrisin
I have never needed them nor anyone else to kill anyone for me.
Real nice statement on a board that, with no doubt, has so many law enforcment agents/agencies following its threads.
I think this statement is about as ignorant as one can get.
Nope, my post has nothing to do with the original title, nor the spat that you are in. Just a post identifying blatant ignorance.
Misfit
Originally posted by phoenixhasrisin
Me thinks the mods should add the word "ignorant" and any derivative, to be censored similar to vulgarity, as it is obviously being mis-used, and abused at this site. (Is there a suggestion box?)
Originally posted by TheShroudOfMemphis
Since when have any of the 'Islamic extreemists' made famous in the western worlds actually followed any Islamic guidelines?
Bin Laden wears a watch and a gold ring - Not Allowed.
Al-Zarqawi wears a gold ring - Not Allowed.
All the 'Al Qaedas' kill innocent people including fellow Arabs - Not Allowed.
I think it's pushing crap up a hill to try and play along with the illusion that these acts are being done by religious fanatics.
I reckon there would be a lot of Musilms around the world laughing at the Western World for believing the 72 virgins story as to why suicide bombers exist, but hey, the west is extreemly guliable about people they know nothing about and love to believe a good story.
Seriously folks, the easiest way to defeat your enemies is to first understand them and then know who they actually are.
Originally posted by Misfit
Me thinks you should ask several other posters what they see in your statement. It is not just an implication, but an admittance of.
"I have never needed them nor anyone else to kill anyone for me."