Exactly. I bet the person who started this thread thinks it might stop wars, but in fact it could start more. What if Jacques Chirac says something
stupid against Americans and we vote to attack France or something...dumb idea IMHO.
Wouldn't the idea be more like...
The leader of the country puts together a proposal - and then the public votes?
That's not the same as having a public errantly voting for every cause that comes up, correct? It seems to be more about letting the people being
involved in decisions made by leaders...not so much that the people are deciding willynilly what's going to happen (or not).
Any thoughts on the draft part of the original post?